Article August 10, 1935 Issue

FROM LETTERS, SUBSTANTIALLY AS PUBLISHED

In your issue of the twelfth there appeared a letter in the...

Bevy C. Godwin, Committee on Publication for Mississippi,—Tupelo

Daily News

In your issue of the twelfth there appeared a letter in the forum in which the writer questions Mrs. Eddy's use of the term "Principle" for God. If he knew the meaning of this term as used in Christian Science, there would be no objection.

The terms "Spirit," "Love," and "Principle" are synonymous, and refer to God alone (see Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, p. 465). These terms are not only properly and correctly used, but serve to bring God much nearer and make Him dearer to us. Your correspondent agrees that God is Love but says, "Here love is personified," thus indicating that God is a physical being with a finite form; but if this be true, how can He be infinite and everywhere present, as the Bible teaches?

When Philip's challenge, "Shew us the Father," was given to Jesus, he said, "Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip?" Although this disciple was with the Master daily and witnessed the healing of all manner of sickness and disease, saw how the blind were made to see, the deaf to hear, the lame to walk, how the sinning were reformed, and the dead raised, yet he failed to understand that the Father, the divine Principle, Love, was being manifested through the Son in the mighty works which he performed. The Master, Christ Jesus, said further, "Believe me for the very works' sake."

Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.

Send a comment to the editors
NEXT IN THIS ISSUE
Article
I wish to express my appreciation of the very broadminded...
August 10, 1935
Contents

We'd love to hear from you!

Easily submit your testimonies, articles, and poems online.

Submit