Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
The writers in two published letters disagree with a Christian Science...
The Journal
The writers in two published letters disagree with a Christian Science lecturer who in the course of his address made the statement that "Jesus never claimed to be God." Had these friends read a full text of the lecture I am sure they would not have been led to believe that Christian Scientists deny the divinity of the Christ. There are no people on earth who believe more unqualifiedly in the divinity of the Christ than do Christian Scientists. They, however, apply the name Jesus to him who was born in Bethlehem and crucified on Calvary. In other words, the name Jesus is applied to the human nature of Christ Jesus, which was derived from his mother Mary. When referring to this nature the Master repeatedly spoke of himself as "the Son of man." Christian Scientists apply the name or title Christ to the divine nature which Christ Jesus derived from God and which is coexistent and coeternal with God. When alluding to his divine nature our Saviour spoke of himself as "the Son of God."
Christian Scientists believe, in accord with the teachings of the Scriptures, that the human nature, or the man Jesus, is not God, but they do not thereby deny the divinity of the Christ. To them the Son and the Father cannot be identical—the Son of God cannot be his own Father. This is indicated in the Master's statements, "My Father is greater than I," and "I can of mine own self do nothing." All of the Scriptural quotations, therefore, cited in the letters of these correspondents are accepted without question by Christian Scientists.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
November 27, 1915 issue
View Issue-
"The longing to be better"
SAMUEL GREENWOOD
-
A Wednesday Evening Healing
REV. ANDREW J. GRAHAM
-
Seeking a Sign
ANNA W. HOLLEBAUGH
-
True Baptism
ELMORE W. MURRAY
-
Our Right Place
WINIFRED E. COWARD
-
Light from the Lessons
INEZ TRETHEWEY
-
Gift of Producing
CASSIUS M. LOOMIS
-
Trinity
VICTOR BUCHANAN
-
A speaker from New York city advertised that he would...
Ezra W. Palmer
-
It would hardly seem possible that a minister of the gospel...
W. D. Kilpatrick
-
A number of tracts attacking Christian Science have recently...
Mrs. Mary Henderson Toms
-
There is nothing in Christian Science to warrant the statement...
J. Edgar Fielding
-
One might think from the recent remarks of an evangelist...
Gordon J. Murray
-
Christian Science does not teach the worship or following...
Willis D. McKinstry
-
Educating the Public
Archibald McLellan
-
Faith Not Credulity
Annie M. Knott
-
Consenting unto Death
John B. Willis
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Manley O. Hudson, Francis Atwell
-
Gratitude for the complete change Christian Science has...
Samuel H. Deirks
-
I first became interested in Christian Science through my...
Sara Abbott Bruce
-
In the early part of September, 1910, my little daughter...
Sue E. Kohlhass
-
It is with thankfulness to God, and gratitude to our...
Marie Walters
-
Since I came into Christian Science many evidences of the...
Grace M. Bosworth
-
I am very grateful for what Christian Science has done...
L. D. Buchanan
-
From the time that I was two years old until I went to a...
George L. Morrison
-
To those whose healing comes slowly I wish to tell a portion...
Hannah S. Davis
-
It was in the fall of 1912 that I first heard of Christian Science
Lillian M. Johnson
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from M. A. Matthews, H. C. Tolman