Good Omnipotent

In a characteristically pithy sentence Mrs. Eddy on page 228 of "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" settles forever the question of God's omnipotence and the powerlessness of evil. "There is no power apart from God," she declares; and adds, "Omnipotence has all-power, and to acknowledge any other power is to dishonor God." With what definiteness she states the case; and with what definiteness God, good, is the only power. And if we, in our thought, seem to give power to something besides God, then we dishonor Him; we break the First Commandment. Moreover, if we acknowledge another power, if we give power to any type of evil, to sin, sickness, and death, we seem to be subject to that belief in just the degree of our acceptance of it; evil's seeming power is just in proportion to the reality we give it in our thought.

In declaring God's omnipotence, Mrs. Eddy was following precisely in the footsteps of the holy men of the Bible. From Genesis to Revelation, those spiritually illuminated acknowledged the all-power of God, whether Deity was regarded as Jehovah, as in many of the early books of the Scriptures, or understood as Spirit, as in the New Testament. The inspired writer of Genesis records that when Abraham was ninety-nine years old the Lord appeared to him and said, "I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect." And the Revelator wrote, "And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth." There was no doubt with either of these inspired writers, between whom stretch many centuries, as to the all-power, the omnipotence of God.

It does not follow, however, that all the Biblical writers who acknowledged God's omnipotence also recognized Him as infinite good. In fact the evidence is quite to the contrary. But Mrs. Eddy, following the precepts of the blessed Master, denies both reality and power to any phase or claim of evil. That God is All, and good, is her fundamental teaching. In view of this, how mistaken are we when we admit into consciousness even the possibility that evil is, and has power, for then do we either deny God's omnipotence, or we attribute to Him the knowledge of evil, thus making God responsible for the hardships and sins of humanity. Such a conclusion utterly contradicts both the spirit and the letter of Christian teaching. Furthermore, it seems that although we recognize the all-power of good and utilize our understanding to destroy the claims of evil expressed as sickness and sin, as want and inharmony, yet we do not apply this understanding to all the problems of mankind. It is as though the omnipotence of good which we acknowledge and utilize in destroying the claims of evil for persons, were not equally practical and available in the destruction of all untoward conditions of whatsoever type or form which confront the race. Is there not a delinquency here which Christian Scientists should remedy, and in remedying it, thus bestow a blessing upon a whole nation, perhaps on a whole race; or even upon all humanity? To detach the error from the thought of personality and to attack it as abstract evil is the need. In whatever direction evil seems to threaten, its destruction is brought about by spiritual power; it is no less amenable to the omnipotence of God when threatening as a common peril than when manifested as personalized discord, either as sin or disease. In whatever form evil may seem to menace, the remedy is at hand: it only remains to be applied; and the remedy is always in terms of Christ, Truth.

Let us not forget that scientific destruction of evil injures none, but blesses all; even though it may thwart personal ambition and defeat selfish seeking for personal gain, yet the destruction of evil can never result in aught but blessing. Does not our Leader assure us of this in Science and Health (p. 206): "In the scientific relation of God to man, we find that whatever blesses one blesses all, as Jesus showed with the loaves and the fishes,—Spirit, not matter, being the source of supply"? And Spirit, God, is the source of the supply of all good, of the Christ, Truth, which applied with understanding destroys all erroneous beliefs. As Christian Scientists we acknowledge and accept this teaching as fully as we do all that Mrs. Eddy has set forth. But how practical do we make it? Do we apply it to all situations where evil and disaster seem to threaten? If not, then we are not wholly faithful to all our Leader's teachings and admonitions. In case of predicted disaster from what are termed natural phenomena, whether earthquake, hurricane, fire, or lightning stroke, do we declare God's omnipotence? When disagreement between nations threatens war, do we know the all-power of good? When evil forces seek to gain political supremacy in order to supplant righteous government with personal, private, and party gain, do we declare both the omnipotence and omnipresence of good? Do we know and assert that God, the only power, is the governor of His universe? If this be done with understanding, with absolute assurance and fidelity, the reign of His righteousness will be made manifest to meet the need of the hour. But let this scientific prayer be apart from persons. For the purpose of righteous prayer is not to promote the desires or aims of any person, party, or group, but rather to establish God's kingdom on earth whereby all will be blessed; for God sends the rain alike on the just and the unjust.

Albert F. Gilmore

NEXT IN THIS ISSUE
Editorial
"Thou hearest me always"
September 8, 1928
Contents

We'd love to hear from you!

Easily submit your testimonies, articles, and poems online.

Submit