Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Prayer
A recent decision of the supreme court of the state of New York regarding the legal status of Christian Science practice, revives many important questions concerning the nature as well as the purpose and effect of prayer. The Scriptures throughout point to a reliance upon God in all times of trouble. His truth is represented as the universal panacea, and no form of sin or disease is excepted from its beneficent operation.
Somehow along the shores of time a belief in exceptions to divine law crept in, and although there seems never to have been a time when Christian people did not rely upon God for a remedy for sin, they had in large measure adopted other means of seeking relief from sickness. While Christendom had not entirely lost faith in the divine power and willingness to heal, it had so far lost sight of the practicality of spiritual healing that quite generally it had adopted the habit of depending upon material remedies for bodily cures. It was left to Mrs. Eddy to revive the practice of turning to God alone as a means of healing sickness. This practice being new and unusual, was naturally questioned by many religious persons, as well as others, for the reason that all new things must run the gantlet of public criticism until they have thoroughly demonstrated their efficiency and their right to claim the interest of humanity.
On page 1 of the Christian Science text-book, "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures," Mrs. Eddy says, "The prayer that reforms the sinner and heals the sick is an absolute faith that all things are possible to God,—a spiritual understanding of Him, an unselfed love." That a final decision, so far as human authority goes, was left to the highest judicial tribunal of New York, simply illustrates the fact that broad, well developed judicial keenness was required to note the righteousness of applying prayer to sickness as well as to sin.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
May 26, 1917 issue
View Issue-
Prayer
ALFRED FARLOW
-
The New Woman
HON. ELEANORA MONEY COUTTS
-
Direction
EDWARD E. DANIELL
-
Education
MARY F. MECREDY
-
Thought Enlightened
S. KING RUSSELL
-
No Lack
LAURENE GARDNER
-
"Good thoughts"
NELLIE R. CRAVEN
-
Mary Baker Eddy
MORRIS ABEL BEER
-
A recent issue contains an article in which a Christian Scientist...
Charles W. J. Tennant
-
It was C. G. Montefiore, a prominent adherent of Judaism...
Judge Clifford P. Smith
-
The editor makes the assertion that I "admit that denial...
B. F. Chandler
-
A critic, while generously acknowledging the good which...
H. S. Hughes, Jr.,
-
A local clergyman has asked for some passage of Scripture...
W. Stuart Booth
-
In an article on the subject "Worry the Disease of the...
H. R. Colborne
-
In an editorial the question is raised as to the attitude of...
William C. Kaufman
-
Neither Law nor Gospel
Archibald McLellan
-
The Call and the Answer
Annie M. Knott
-
Real Ambition
William D. McCrackan
-
Expressions of Gratitude
Editor
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Walter Wilding , Edith I. Weeks, Walter W. Hummer
-
Having enjoyed and profited by the testimonies in our...
William B. Harrison
-
It is over thirty years since I first heard of Christian Science...
Jennie D. Harmes
-
I am deeply grateful for the understanding of the Bible...
Huldah J. Hoag
-
A number of years ago I became dissatisfied with the...
Kate C. Devendorf
-
I wish to express my gratitude for Christian Science,...
E. M. Buchanan
-
A few years ago I was suffering from such a severe...
Minnie L. Stiles
-
I would like to express my gratitude for the many benefits...
Herbert Bentley
-
It is with a heart full of gratitude that I tell how tenderly...
Laura C. Hall with contributions from Charles Hall
-
Immunity
MYRTLE STRODE JACKSON
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from H. Maldwyn Hughes, William A. Elliott, Arthur Pringle, J. Stuart Holden, Charles Brown