Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Christian Science
Vanity Fair
Talking of symptoms, I am greatly interested in the recent case against the Christian Scientists. Without expressing an opinion on a subject of which I am almost wholly ignorant, I am unable to refrain from weighing the pros and cons of this religion in my mind.
On the one hand it seems to me incredible that intelligent men and women (and no one can doubt the intelligence of many members of the Christian Science community) can seriously say that they would call in a surgeon to replace a broken bone but would not call in a physician for a septic wound possibly supervening on an operation performed by the self-same surgeon. Neither can I understand why they should find it necessary to wash a wound with soap and water and dress it with lint and bandages if the wound is merely a disease existent in what they call the mortal mind. On the other hand, I think the outcry against their "cure failures" is unnecessarily bitter and vituperative. A doctor attends a person suffering from a disease, and after constantly treating his patient and giving an endless amount of drugs, the patient very often dies. No one has a word to say against the physician who has failed to cure. Also, it must be remembered that the person who goes to a Christian Scientist has often—I do not say always—been already given up as hopeless by the doctors. As a lover of fair play, I think too much is made of their failures. Moreover, they have, quite apart from the physical, an enormously beneficial moral influence.
I myself know a society woman who has become a Scientist, and who from being heartless and frivolous has grown sweet and unselfish and unworldly to an extent that is positively staggering; and this is by no means an isolated case. The "Science," or religion, or whatever it is called, certainly has the most extraordinary effect on the mind, and who shall dare to say that a science that has grown by such leaps and bounds, and whose followers are many of them men and women of undoubted intellectuality, is the mere charlatanism that physicians and coroners consider it to be?
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
June 30, 1906 issue
View Issue-
Christian Science and Health
with contributions from Frederick Dixon, M.D., Mabel S. Thomson
-
Spiritually Minded
REV. WILLIAM P. MC KENZIE.
-
Those who have attended the Torrey-Alexander meetings...
Albert E. Miller
-
To the Editor of the Morning Post
Observer
-
Hawaii
Helen W. Kelley
-
Southern India
R. Kolandaivelee
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Allan Schley, Clarence C. Eaton, W. E. Stanley, Hugh C. Smith
-
MRS. EDDY TAKES NO PATIENTS
Editor
-
Greetings
Mary Baker Eddy
-
By Way of Appreciation
Archibald McLellan
-
Regarding Patriotism
John B. Willis
-
A Vital Faith
Annie M. Knott
-
Letters to our Leader
with contributions from Grace W. Fairchild, Ella R. Parsons, Robert W. Tompkins
-
I was healed by Christian Science seven years ago
Melissa Hoffman
-
For a number of years I had been troubled with sore...
M. E. Stephen
-
I was troubled for over two years with my throat, and had...
Charles Ritchey
-
About twelve years ago, when going downstairs, I...
Virginia Babcock
-
When I first heard of Christian Science, I had been an...
Lillie E. Scott
-
During the early months of 1904 I had frequent attacks...
H. R. Fearnside
-
Five years ago my view of life was very distorted, yet...
Lizzie Halyard
-
Before I knew anything of Christian Science Mind-healing...
Florence Jennings with contributions from Frederic G. Sherman
-
In March, 1905, I was suddenly seized with illness...
Eveline C. Beals with contributions from Lucy Larcom