Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
ITEMS OF INTEREST
Eight railroads controlled, in 1907, 78,04 percent of the entire production of anthracite in the United States, says New York Tribune. The proporation today is, if anything, greater than that. This figure, however, does not present the complete story of the grip which these eight railroads, with their tonnage and price "understandings," exercise over the an anthracite industry. The reason why the independent coal operators, even though they mine only 21.96 per cent of the anthracite supply, do not inject a semblance of competition into the trade may be found in the existence of what are known as the "sixty-five per cent contracts." Through these contracts the alleged "independent" operators dispose of more than a third of their total output to the coal departments or subsidiary companies of the eight railroads. The "independents" who are parties to them have agreed that the contracts should run for the life of the mines. The control of the eight railroads over these sixty-five per cent contract operators is, therefore, only less complete than their control of their own subsidiary coal mining companies. And as these contract operators produce a third of the coal mined by the independents, or, roughly, seven per cent of the total production of anthracite, they swell the percentage of production over which the eight railroads exercise sovereignty to eighty-five.
The Boston Chamber of Commerce has been asked to help the interstate commerce commission in its coming investigation of the New York, New Haven & Hartford, the Boston & Maine, and the Maine Central railroads. The order to investigate follows the resolution recently adopted by the chamber, in which it asked the Legislature that Governor Foss' merger bill be postponed until the railroad situation in Massachusetts and New England should be studied by an impartial board. "Complaint having been made to this commission," says the order received from the interstate commission, "that the carriers hereinafter named and each of them have filed with this commission certain rates, classifications and regulations, the enforcement of which has been unjust, unreasonable, unjustly discriminatory, unduly preferential and prejudicial, and otherwise in violation of the act to regulate commerce, and that the practices of said carriers and each of them in the conduct of business subject to said act are unjust, unreasonable, unjustly discriminatory, unduly preferential and prejudicial, and otherwise in violation of the provisions of said act: "It is ordered that an inquiry be and the same hereby is instituted by this commission on its own motion into the rates, classifications, regulations, and practices of the carriers named."
The system of coast defense fortifications which protects the maritime cities, harbors, and important waterways of the United States proper is probably the most extensive and complete in existence, says The Scientific American. It was planned in 1886 by a special army board, known as the Endicott board, and after two decades of continuous contruction it may now be considered as practically complete. The total cost of the work to date is one hundred and forty million dollars. It includes at present 388 twelve-inch mortars, 113 twelve-ich guns, 136 ten-inch, 74 eight-inch, and 531 guns of smaller calibers than eight-inch. Also there are yet to be mounted in the various batteries two sixteen-inch guns, 163 twelve-inch mortars, 31 fourteen-inch, 45 twelve-inch, and 98 guns of calibers less than eight-inch. A single one of the twelve-inch guns costs forty-nine thousand dollars, and hence the 113 guns of this caliber alone represent an expenditure of some five and a half million dollars. Every time a twelve-inch gun is fired with an armor-piercing, high-explosive shell it costs the country six hundred dollars.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
June 8, 1912 issue
View Issue-
VICTORY OVER TEMPER
M. G. KAINS, M.S.
-
THE LITTLE CHILD
LOUISE F. D. SPOOR.
-
"NO CONDEMNATION"
EMILY JOHNSON JONES
-
Your note on the Christian Science publishing house in...
Frederick Dixon
-
In your editorial of recent date, entitled "Mind Over...
Warwick L. Tyler
-
Christian Science is not based upon the human mind as...
Olcott Haskell
-
In the issue of the State Journal for Jan. 29 appeared a...
Royal D. Steams
-
The admonition which the Master gave is still in force,...
William S. Campbell
-
A leading article in a late issue, on the women's page,...
A. W. Mainland
-
"HE THAT SEEKETH FINDETH"
Archibald McLellan
-
THE LARGER INDEPENDENCE
John B. Willis
-
THE RIGHT ANSWER
Annie M. Knott
-
THE LECTURES
with contributions from Frank C. Hills, Marshall Livingston Perrin, Earl F. Phelps, J. Bouldin Rector, C. K. Raber, Samuel H. Woodson
-
It is with deep gratitude that I tell of my wonderful...
Mildred Willis Kelley with contributions from Edward Niles Kelley
-
Christian Science has helped me so often and in so many...
Marguerite Marie Deutschendorff with contributions from Mary C. Deutschendorff
-
I am very thankful to our heavenly Father for His...
W. J. McLean
-
For a long time I have felt that I should express my...
Alida A. Baxter
-
I can never feel too grateful for what Christian Science...
Louisa Grotfeld
-
I wish to express my gratitude to God, also to our dear...
Sarah A. Brooks
-
Four years ago Christian Science healed me of eye...
Minnie Sachs
-
"I SHALL BE SATISFIED"
VIOLET RHODES.
-
FROM OUR EXCHANGES
with contributions from John F. Carson