Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
No ill effects on childbirth from Rh-negative blood
When my husband and I were expecting our first child back in the ’70s, we went to a local doctor for prenatal care. He took a blood test and came back with the news that I had Rh-negative blood. He said this would not be a problem for this present child, but that it could have an adverse, even fatal effect on a newborn, should I have more children. He warned that unless I took a drug to counteract this within 24 hours of childbirth, my husband and I should count on only one child.
These dark predictions were extremely alarming to me. I called a Christian Science practitioner for prayerful support, and I prayed with a depth of need I had rarely felt before. I realized that perhaps most moms would gratefully turn to that drug as a solution. Being a lifelong student of Christian Science, and having witnessed many times its healing power, I was more inclined to turn to God to bring harmony rather than to drugs. I mentally protested against the proposition that a mix of chemicals had more power to protect life than God, who is Life itself. I vigorously claimed in prayer God’s allness, omnipotence, and infinite capacity to maintain His creation. By the time our first child was born we had moved, and the doctor who first alerted us to this condition was not on the case. I felt such certainty that I could trust God completely that I did not take the drug. The birth was a harmonious one.
My husband and I continued our prayer. When we found ourselves expecting again about a year later, I knew I needed to focus single-mindedly on the spiritual facts about this second child and me. Daily I strove to see more clearly that God is the sole creator, and that He lovingly cares for all He creates. I was not the source of that child’s life, and therefore I could not be its destroyer. God already knew and loved this precious little one, and I strove to understand this more clearly. God’s law of love overruled any supposed law or action of malicious antibodies.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
January 16, 2012 &
January 23, 2012
double issue
View Issue
-
Letters
Mary Ann Ott, Clare Ham Grosgebauer, John Moorhead
-
Permanent joy
Ingrid Peschke, Managing Editor
-
Search for 'the God particle' continues
John Yemma
-
Pure joy
By Kevin Graunke
-
A happy home
By Melanie Wahlberg
-
No ifs, ands...or Buds?
By Phyllis Zeno
-
Hang gliding and the joy of healing
By Susan Ozanne
-
'Let's go!'
By Penelope Ducharme Darling
-
It's no surprise
Kim Shippey
-
No pawns in God's kingdom
By Randy Erwin
-
Moses moments
By Mark DeGange
-
A promise, kept
Barbara Whitewater
-
Out with 'desert-place' thinking
By Candace Lynch
-
Trusting our spiritual instrument panel
Roger Whiteway
-
Where the sun never sets
By Frederick R. Andresen
-
My encounter with the sun
Manfred Krüger
-
Seeing through the snowflakes
By Mimi Oka
-
Don't let your eyes fool you!
By Michael Mooslin
-
Church prayer meetings lead to healing of depression
By Marilyn McPherson
-
Lessons in upper management
By Jane Hickson
-
Ocean promise
Gail Miller
-
Haiku
Sue Knight
-
The call
Ellen Hammond
-
A winter heart
Beatrice Labarthe
-
Home
Pattie Johnston
-
I hear you
By Ann Sebring
-
How we prayed with the Lord's Prayer
Mary, Sarah, Isaac, Conrad
-
Youth summit
Marta Greenwood
-
In Truth's courtroom
By Nancy Fisher
-
Love is our shepherd
By Michael Hamilton
-
Everything changed
Emilienne Hastings
-
Finding healing for victim and victimizer
Colleen Douglass
-
No ill effects on childbirth from Rh-negative blood
Anna Lisa Kronman
-
Painful condition in foot dissolved
Kay Keelor
-
Grateful for God's protection
Dean G. Wolfe
-
Healing of severe leg pain
Claude C. Smith, Jr.
-
How's life treating you?
The Editors