Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
One of the contentions of a medical doctor in a recent issue...
New Bedford (Mass.) Standard
One of the contentions of a medical doctor in a recent issue was that a person may become qualified to practise Christian Science by preparing to pass the examination of the state board of registration in medicine, and that the practice of Christian Science should therefore be confined to those who have passed such an examination. As a matter of fact, however, the preparation required for such an examination never qualified any one to practise Christian Science, and it is not intended to do so.
The practice of Christian Science is a ministry in which proficiency depends upon moral character and spiritual understanding. Moral character is of course desirable in a physician, and so is spiritual understanding, but if a physician should gain the understanding of spiritual being and power in a sufficient degree for the practice of Christian Science, he would naturally and inevitably change his practice from a material to a spiritual basis. There are a considerable number of persons who formerly practised medicine, but who now practise Christian Science. No one who comprehends both of these systems, however, will attempt to combine them while one continues to be fundamentally material and the other essentially spiritual.
Your correspondent also tried to establish a connection between Christianity, or Christian Science, and medicine, by saying, "One of Christ's disciples was a physician, and we have no record of his finding fault with this one's profession." There are two difficulties with this argument. In the first place, we have no record that Luke ever came in contact with Jesus. Luke was probably a resident of Antioch, in Syria, who became interested in Christianity through the missionary work of Paul. However this may be, the first few verses of the gospel according to Luke show that he was not an eyewitness of the events which he recorded. In the second place, there is no reason for believing that Luke continued to practise medicine after adopting Christianity. Professor Harnack, the famour theologian, who wrote a book entitled "Luke the Physician," concluded that Luke enbraced the Christian religion for the very reason that "by its means, and by quite new methods, he would be able to heal disease and drive out evil spirits." Luke was the first physician to change his practice to a distinctly Christian basis.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
September 18, 1915 issue
View Issue-
The Life-giving Voice
IRVING C. TOMLINSON, M.A.
-
"Mental swaddling-clothes"
KATE W. BUCK
-
"Lovest thou me?"
VIOLET KER SEYMER
-
Overcoming of Self
JAMES EDWARD VON RHEIN
-
Search-lights
IDA HUME
-
"Where no fear was"
GWENDOLYN THOMAS
-
One of the contentions of a medical doctor in a recent issue...
Judge Clifford P. Smith
-
In a recent issue I find a statement from Evangelist—to...
John S. Rendall
-
"Inalienable rights"
Archibald McLellan
-
Daily Bread
Annie M. Knott
-
Flee from Fleshliness
John B. Willis
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
John V. Dittemore
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Abbott B. Rice, Ralph T. Shultz, M. M. York, R. A. Tallcott
-
Materia medica pronounced my trouble a quick decline
Kate Joy Gray
-
It is now about five years since we first learned of Christian Science
Naomi Lundquist with contributions from Charles V. Lundquist
-
I wish to join the glad throng of those who are voicing...
Isabel M. Hodson
-
We have been interested in Christian Science for over nine...
Janet G. Montague
-
I desire to tell others what Christian Science has done and...
Josephine Mullins
-
It is about ten years since I first heard of Christian Science
K. M. Henderson
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from W. E. Orchard, George P. Mains, John Reid Shannon