Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
We have been asked how The Christian Science Monitor...
The Christian Science Monitor
We have been asked how The Christian Science Monitor maintains a nonpartisan standard. Some critics go so far as to say the Monitor should eschew politics altogether. We do refuse to play politics or be played by partisan politicians. But politics in its truest and best definition is the science of government, and the Monitor is thus vitally interested, and as a newspaper has a responsibility to promote the best there is in government "of the people, by the people, and for the people," as Lincoln put it.
The editorial page is the place where the Monitor expresses its opinion, approval or disapproval. But the news pages must be judged from an entirely different standpoint than the editorial page. On the news pages the Monitor prints the news; that is, what is going on, what men think and what they do. Because we print news of important activities does not necessarily mean that the Monitor approves them entirely. For instance, just now the Monitor will report actions and statements from the Republican Convention. Our stories will record various claims of the Republican Party. These stories will contain criticisms of the Democratic Party, and especially the present Administration. Some of our Democratic friends will read these stories and charge us with being partisan Republican. But they should read the paper regularly to get a balanced view of the picture. The Monitor as a newspaper will report claims of the Democratic cohorts [at the Democratic Convention] and criticisms of the Republicans. We make an earnest effort to keep reports of both these conventions balanced and accurate, factual not opinionative, so that the reader may have unbiased information upon which to form his own judgment.
Just for comparison I should like to go back twenty-five years and read a statement by one of the first editors of the Monitor setting forth what Mrs. Eddy wanted her newspaper to be.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
August 1, 1936 issue
View Issue-
Our Father in Heaven
ANDREW J. GRAHAM
-
Consistent Thinking
JEANETTE F. SUTTON
-
Awakening
STACY M. SNOW
-
Nothingness of Evil
HELEN M. MULLIN
-
The Sanctity of Home
NELLIE WOO
-
Eternity versus Time
RUTH STOCKTON
-
The Piece of Silver
LUDA F. CORLEY
-
A Solid Foundation
KATE E. ANDREAE
-
My Prayer
MARY F. KINGSTON
-
Please let me mention my satisfaction in finding in the...
George Channing, Committee on Publication for Northern California,
-
In your last issue, under the heading "Imagination,"...
Stanley M. Sydenham, Committee on Publication for Yorkshire, England,
-
We have been asked how The Christian Science Monitor...
From the Address of Paul S. Deland,
-
From a letter dated 1891
MARY BAKER EDDY
-
God with Us
Duncan Sinclair
-
"Motives and Acts"
George Shaw Cook
-
Letter from the Board of Lectureship
The Christian Science Board of Lectureship
-
The Lectures
with contributions from George Byron Addison, Simeon Coll, Jennie E. Love
-
From childhood up to my thirty-eighth year I suffered...
Abraham Loebe
-
In grateful acknowledgment of innumerable blessings...
Julia L. Moss
-
I should like to relate how purity of thought, free from...
Esther K. Westwood
-
I am very thankful for Christian Science
Marie Hoffmann
-
I have been healed of bronchitis in a severe form, neuralgia...
Alice Elizabeth Meinch
-
For over eighteen years Christian Science has been my...
Ernest E. Tietsche
-
My Supply
LEILA SMITH GRIFFITH
-
Signs of the Times
with contributions from Helen Keller, F. Townley Lord, Frank M. Selover