Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
The second of the letters against Christian Science written...
Omaha (Neb.) World-Herald
The second of the letters against Christian Science written for your columns by a Lutheran minister has disclosed the hiatus in his thinking. Evidently the crux of his whole contention is the unproved assumption that the Son of God is God. A member of the clerical profession who can fail to notice such a logical chasm as that has no license to speak against other people's religion. He needs to reconsider his own.
It is quite true that Jesus spoke of himself as the Son of God. In my former letter I cited John x. 36, where he said, "I am the Son of God," as a denial and correction of the charge that he claimed to be God. There is no process by which these words can be converted into a claim that he was God. Even the Jews who were trying to get proof of their accusation did not attempt to put that construction upon them. In order to understand the word "Son," as used by Jesus, we must consider his use of the word "Father," for each of these words is the counterpart and complement of the other. In the gospels we find that he spoke not only of "my Father," but of "the Father," "our Father," and "your Father;" and he used these titles interchangeably. This fact of itself proves that he did not regard himself as God.
It is also to be proved that Jesus spoke of other men as sons or children of God, and he expressed his whole aim and object in the words, "that where I am, there ye may be also." Furthermore, the words "Father" and "Son," as Jesus used them, expressed both kinship and likeness, both relation and kindred nature. They denoted that the nature of God is imaged or reflected by man; that is, by the real man. This is what Jesus meant when he said, "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father."
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
November 6, 1915 issue
View Issue-
Thanksgiving Proclamation
Woodrow Wilson with contributions from Robert Lansing
-
Scientific Mastery
WILLIAM R. RATHVON
-
Possession
FRANK H. SPRAGUE
-
Mental Breadth
BESSIE E. LANGDON
-
Love and Patience
RUTH INGRAHAM
-
The Burning Bush
SAMUEL JOHNSTONE MACDONALD
-
Offertory
EMILY HOUSEHOLDER
-
The second of the letters against Christian Science written...
Judge Clifford P. Smith
-
A statement as fairly applicable to poverty as to disease...
Thorwald Siegfried
-
A sermon preached in Omaha in opposition to Christian Science...
Carl E. Herring
-
In a recent issue I find an article under the caption, "A...
John L. Rendall
-
"I press toward the mark"
Archibald McLellan
-
"Out of the depths"
John B. Willis
-
Harvest Lessons
Annie M. Knott
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Ernest C. Moses , Donald M. Jones, William H. Dawes
-
I first heard of Christian Science on Thanksgiving day,...
Lottie C. Forbes with contributions from Harry B. Forbes
-
In the fall of 1903, after being ill five years and undergoing...
S. Elizabeth Parker
-
I wish to tell of a few instances in which the efficacy of...
Blanche M. Wetzell
-
Before taking up the study of Christian Science (in 1912)...
Louis Wampfler
-
When Christian Science came into my life, the clouds of...
F. Lillian Lancaster
-
I have received so many blessings since taking up the...
Sam B. Metcalfe
-
It was several years ago that I accepted Christian Science
Ruth H. Bailey Walker
-
I did not become interested in Christian Science through...
Margaret W. Dyer
-
Answered Prayer
PEARLE M. WARREN
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from Edward F. Sanderson, Thomas N. Carver, Edward B. Reese, William J. Hart