Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
A sermon preached in Omaha in opposition to Christian Science...
Omaha (Neb.) World-Herald
A sermon preached in Omaha in opposition to Christian Science assumed such a bias as to call for a few words of comment. It would seem that we might all agree to certain axiomatic propositions,—as that one should not make solemn and reiterated statements that the text-book of Christian Science, "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" by Mrs. Eddy, is such a mass of jumbled confusion that no one can understand it, and then proceed for over two hours to expound its fundamental teachings and denounce them.
Further, the dispassionate listener is apt to be put on inquiry when the church that admittedly has failed in its duty to obey the command to "heal the sick," admits that Christian Science is endeavoring to meet that duty, and yet denounces this religion as unscriptural and contrary to the teachings of Jesus. It brings one near enough to the shores of Galilee to hear the Pharisees say, "This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils," and thus history repeats itself. "Whereas I was blind, now I see," has been accepted for centuries as the final word of argument, and so long as Christian Science submits to this test, it ill becomes any other church to denounce as blasphemous the works which it admits Jesus commanded and which it has failed to do.
No prolixity of discourse is needed to prove the fundamental teachings of Christian Science, nor should these be the occasion of any surprise or as if a mystery had been uncovered. That Christian Science teaches that God is Spirit, Life, Truth, is indeed true. The mystery lies in the fact that a minister of the gospel of a Christian church in an unusually intelligent community should find fault with the proposition. It is safe to say that there is not a member of the infant class in the critic's Sunday school who does not know that "God is love," and probably not one of them ever heard of Science and Health.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
November 6, 1915 issue
View Issue-
Thanksgiving Proclamation
Woodrow Wilson with contributions from Robert Lansing
-
Scientific Mastery
WILLIAM R. RATHVON
-
Possession
FRANK H. SPRAGUE
-
Mental Breadth
BESSIE E. LANGDON
-
Love and Patience
RUTH INGRAHAM
-
The Burning Bush
SAMUEL JOHNSTONE MACDONALD
-
Offertory
EMILY HOUSEHOLDER
-
The second of the letters against Christian Science written...
Judge Clifford P. Smith
-
A statement as fairly applicable to poverty as to disease...
Thorwald Siegfried
-
A sermon preached in Omaha in opposition to Christian Science...
Carl E. Herring
-
In a recent issue I find an article under the caption, "A...
John L. Rendall
-
"I press toward the mark"
Archibald McLellan
-
"Out of the depths"
John B. Willis
-
Harvest Lessons
Annie M. Knott
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Ernest C. Moses , Donald M. Jones, William H. Dawes
-
I first heard of Christian Science on Thanksgiving day,...
Lottie C. Forbes with contributions from Harry B. Forbes
-
In the fall of 1903, after being ill five years and undergoing...
S. Elizabeth Parker
-
I wish to tell of a few instances in which the efficacy of...
Blanche M. Wetzell
-
Before taking up the study of Christian Science (in 1912)...
Louis Wampfler
-
When Christian Science came into my life, the clouds of...
F. Lillian Lancaster
-
I have received so many blessings since taking up the...
Sam B. Metcalfe
-
It was several years ago that I accepted Christian Science
Ruth H. Bailey Walker
-
I did not become interested in Christian Science through...
Margaret W. Dyer
-
Answered Prayer
PEARLE M. WARREN
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from Edward F. Sanderson, Thomas N. Carver, Edward B. Reese, William J. Hart