Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
True Civil Law
Like perplexed and troubled Pilate thousands of legal authorities down through the centuries have meditated upon and asked the vibrant question: "What is truth?" This question is necessitated by the intrusion of a false sense, untruth, into human consciousness. Untruth presents such an array of feasible reasons for being accepted as reality, that the mortal mind, either wearied with the arguments for and against, or afflicted with that mental laziness which welcomes every excuse for passivity, having no fixed principle on which to base a righteous decision, simply reiterates, What is truth?
This momentous question would never have been asked in the Roman judgment hall had mankind been obedient to divine law or true civil law, and not sought other gods or attempted to establish its own opinions as the standard of practice. That the usurpation of mere human opinion for true civil law has been unsuccessful for the regulation of human affairs throughout the history of the world will be readily admitted, and even as the various peoples of Biblical times drifted from the true conception of government to the establishing of something more appeasive of mortal desire, so we of to-day are subjected to the enacting of almost as many laws as there are desires in the human mind. Such laws are the result of the ebb and flow of mortal opinion; they may be said to be the yardstick with which to measure mankind's varying mental states.
From a metaphysical standpoint let us analyze this assertion regarding civil law as of human authorship. In the first place we see that what are called laws are generally not laws at all but attempts to establish human opinion as law. These so-called laws are the general acceptance of theories promulgated by those elected to authority for the regulation of public conduct. These regulations may be said, in general, to be the outcome of human needs, of human wants predicated on the temporary beliefs of mortal mind, or they are of political origination, the more selfish form of the latter being known as the "joker," the selfish implication being concealed among fair-sounding words.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
April 6, 1918 issue
View Issue-
"The scientific majority"
THE HONORABLE MRS. ERIC CARR
-
True Civil Law
PERCY PHILLIP VYLE
-
Unfailing Guidance
L. LILLIAN ELLIAS, M.A.
-
The Reading Rooms
L. A. IRELAND
-
Channels
MAUD TILLERY TRUMBO
-
Now
HUGH STUART CAMPBELL
-
Penitence
SAMUEL JOHNSTONE MACDONALD
-
Christian Scientists hope that The Milwaukee Leader...
Judge Clifford P. Smith
-
Prayer in Christian Science is not so much a pleading...
Peter V. Ross
-
In an item in a recent issue of The Truth Seeker, surprise...
Albert F. Gilmore
-
Religion and Politics
The Christian Science Board of Directors
-
Practicing Hospitality
William P. McKenzie
-
Cleansing the Temple
Annie M. Knott
-
Times and Seasons
William D. McCrackan
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
Charles E. Jarvis
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Helen Percy
-
Thirteen years ago I became acquainted with the teachings...
A. Gauss-Huber with contributions from Ida Gauss
-
I have been a student of Christian Science more than a...
Mary Ida Preston
-
With an earnest desire that the doubting of many may...
C. E. Meynell
-
For several years Christian Science has been the only...
John Cormack Dillon
-
When Christian Science was first brought to my notice...
Ruby Dodge Federle
-
The following was the verdict delivered to my wife when...
Edmund Bartels
-
My heart goes out in deepest gratitude for the many...
Stella M. Parker
-
That "man's extremity is God's opportunity" was proved...
Rose M. Koogle
-
From the Press
with contributions from John Gardner, James F. Halliday