Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Neither Mystical nor Miraculous
Step by step hostile criticism has receded before the irrefutable evidence of the healing power of Christian Science. It is quite common today to hear or to read the admission that the cures effected by Christian Science can no longer be denied. This admission, however, is apt to be followed by an attempt to account for the cures on so-called psychological grounds, to refer to them as resulting from the action of one human mind upon another. The statement is then frequently added that such healing is neither mystical nor miraculous, but scientific and rational.
Christian Scientists heartily agree with the wording of this last statement, while they repudiate the mistaken supposition that the human mind is a healer. Among the definitions for mystical given in Webster's dictionary is the word "unknowable," and as an explanation of the word miraculous we find, "performed by supernatural power." The fact that Christian Science can be studied and is being practised by growing multitudes, proves that its results are not unknowable, not above or beyond law, but in accordance with the immutable law of God.
Throughout her writings Mrs. Eddy clearly indicates the rational nature of Christian Science, and by connecting the word Science with Christianity she has once for all dissipated the supposition that spiritual understanding is supernatural or mystical. She writes, "Science dispels mystery and explains extraordinary phenomena; but Science never removes phenomena from the domain of reason into the realm of mysticism" (Science and Health, p. 80). The critics, then, who insist that the cures effected by Christian Science are neither mystical nor miraculous, are right so far as the actual wording of their comments is concerned, but they are mistaken if they suppose that these cures can be accounted for on the basis of sense-testimony or so-called physical law. The whole of Christian Science lies outside of material sense or physique, both as to its actual teaching and its modus operandi. It is absolutely metaphysical. Mrs. Eddy defines Christian Science "as the law of God, the law of good, interpreting and demonstrating the divine Principle and rule of universal harmony" (Rudimental Divine Science, p. 1).
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
February 7, 1914 issue
View Issue-
Neither Mystical nor Miraculous
WILLIAM D. MC CRACKAN, M.A.
-
Right Discrimination
EZRA W. PALMER
-
Right Consciousness
WILLIAM W. PORTER
-
Obedience
BERTHA R. RUEDINGER
-
Redeeming the Human
KRISTINE SCHIÖTT
-
What is True Sympathy?
SOPHY ARGELANDER
-
Our critic, as a controversialist, wanders, so to speak,...
Frederick Dixon
-
Nothing but a misapprehension could cause any one to...
John Ashcroft
-
In a report of the Rev. Mr.—'s second lecture on the...
M. I. Whitcroft
-
"Give us this day our daily bread"
Martin Luther
-
Impersonal Correction
Archibald McLellan
-
Truth's Sufficiency
John B. Willis
-
Faith versus Fear
Annie M. Knott
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
John V. Dittemore
-
The Lectures
with contributions from John A. Grose, C. P. Dorland, Judson Harmon, Judge King Dykeman, N. Luxmoore
-
As Christian Science is the greatest blessing which has...
Harry Ainsworth Wilkie
-
I first heard of Christian Science in January, 1906, and...
E. Annie Fish with contributions from William W. Fish
-
With great joy I give my testimony of healing experienced...
Florence G. Barnard
-
Some time ago I returned to London from the west coast...
J. G. Macfarlane
-
I wish to express my love and thankfulness to God, and...
Mary A. Channell
-
Words cannot express my gratitude to God for what...
Bessie Shannon
-
I am thankful that I can testify to what God has done for...
Annie G. Stephens
-
I am exceedingly grateful for Christian Science, which I...
Julia E. Broughton
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from Thomas Cuming Hall, R. J. Campbell