Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Nothing but a misapprehension could cause any one to...
St. Louis (Mo.) Republic
Nothing but a misapprehension could cause any one to confuse Christian Science Mind-healing with mental suggestion, or attribute the healing efficacy of the former to the latter. The Rev. Mr.—'s identification of these opposites as one, in a recent sermon, illustrates a fallacy as old as the race. The Scriptures indicate that all who have ever contended for the omnipotence and omnipresence of divine Mind have done so in opposition to the belief in minds many. Moses encountered this in his conflict with Pharaoh ; the Pharisees sought to attribute the healing work of Christ Jesus to Beelzebub; and the experience of Philip, Peter, and John with Simon of Samaria, further illustrates this phase of human nature.
Much of this misapprehension arises from ignoring the capitalization in Christian Science literature. When a Christian Scientist refers to Mind, he refers to God, the one supreme, infinite intelligence. When he speaks of mind or minds, he refers to the human sense of things. To Mind, God alone, does the Christian Scientist concede the power to heal. It should require no argument to prove that God is intelligence, and that there can in reality be no other Mind if He is infinite. The belief that there are minds many is the basis of the belief in the possibility of mental suggestion; the understanding that there is but one Mind, and that infinite, is the basis of Christian Science practise.
Mental suggestion is generally regarded as the vehicle of human will. There is no more emphatic declaration in the Christian Science text-book, "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" by Mrs. Eddy, than the following: "Every Christian Scientist, every conscientious teacher of the Science of Mind-healing, knows that human will is not Christian Science" (p. 451). Furthermore, the Manual of The Mother Church, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston, Mass., specifically prohibits the study of hypnotism by Christian Scientists.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
February 7, 1914 issue
View Issue-
Neither Mystical nor Miraculous
WILLIAM D. MC CRACKAN, M.A.
-
Right Discrimination
EZRA W. PALMER
-
Right Consciousness
WILLIAM W. PORTER
-
Obedience
BERTHA R. RUEDINGER
-
Redeeming the Human
KRISTINE SCHIÖTT
-
What is True Sympathy?
SOPHY ARGELANDER
-
Our critic, as a controversialist, wanders, so to speak,...
Frederick Dixon
-
Nothing but a misapprehension could cause any one to...
John Ashcroft
-
In a report of the Rev. Mr.—'s second lecture on the...
M. I. Whitcroft
-
"Give us this day our daily bread"
Martin Luther
-
Impersonal Correction
Archibald McLellan
-
Truth's Sufficiency
John B. Willis
-
Faith versus Fear
Annie M. Knott
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
John V. Dittemore
-
The Lectures
with contributions from John A. Grose, C. P. Dorland, Judson Harmon, Judge King Dykeman, N. Luxmoore
-
As Christian Science is the greatest blessing which has...
Harry Ainsworth Wilkie
-
I first heard of Christian Science in January, 1906, and...
E. Annie Fish with contributions from William W. Fish
-
With great joy I give my testimony of healing experienced...
Florence G. Barnard
-
Some time ago I returned to London from the west coast...
J. G. Macfarlane
-
I wish to express my love and thankfulness to God, and...
Mary A. Channell
-
Words cannot express my gratitude to God for what...
Bessie Shannon
-
I am thankful that I can testify to what God has done for...
Annie G. Stephens
-
I am exceedingly grateful for Christian Science, which I...
Julia E. Broughton
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from Thomas Cuming Hall, R. J. Campbell