Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
The attack on Christian Science and Christian Scientists...
The Apostolic Review
The attack on Christian Science and Christian Scientists in a recent issue again illustrates the weakness of such attacks. Whoever is disposed to condemn parents for relying on Christian Science to prevent or cure disease for their children should at least stop to consider whether there is some other method of prevention or cure that is more reliable. Christian Scientists can speak on this point from experience; usually from experience with more than one system. Most of them have had at least the ordinary experience with material remedies, and have found that Christian Science is much more dependable. The use of law books made in the article was shortsighted. From a paragraph in one of them the critic cited a Wisconsin decision as if it were against Christian Science, without mentioning a New Hampshire decision stated as contrary to the Wisconsin decision in the same paragraph. Moreover, he failed to observe that the subject of the Wisconsin decision was not Christian Science but was spiritualism, and failed to ascertain or mention that the law of Wisconsin recognizes the practice of Christian Science, which it expressly does.
The other legal points set up in the same article were also mistaken or misleading. The fact is that the practice of Christian Science and reliance on it is lawful everywhere, except, possibly, in Germany. A Prussian judge, speaking in 1915, declared that Christian Science "is a teaching that is not in accord with the German spirit," which may be quite true; but an eminent New York judge, speaking in 1916, said, "I deny the power of the legislature to make it a crime to treat disease by prayer;" which is the American and Christian view.
Whether The Apostolic Review has given its readers a relish for attacks on Christian Science or Christian Scientists, may be best known to the editor. Sooner or later, however, they will learn in some manner that Christian Science is simply vital, practical, and complete Christianity. Meanwhile, all that Christian Scientists ask of the editor or contributors of The Apostolic Review, or any paper, is the measure of fairness defined by the golden rule.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
June 15, 1918 issue
View Issue-
Annual Meeting of The Mother Church
with contributions from Laura Gerahty, William D. McCrackan, Francis J. Fluno, Charles E. Jarvis
-
The attack on Christian Science and Christian Scientists...
Judge Clifford P. Smith
-
In the article, "Psychology and Drugs," the assertion...
Albert F. Gilmore
-
An item in a recent issue would leave the impression that...
Lewis L. Harney
-
Living Witnesses
William P. McKenzie
-
"What thinkest thou?"
Annie M. Knott
-
Victory
William D. McCrackan
-
The Lectures
with contributions from H. M. Lord, Charlotte M. Gary, George Ford Morris
-
I turned to Christian Science several years ago, not for...
Edna Stetson with contributions from Alice M. Jones
-
Christian Science was brought to us eight years ago when...
Lester Weaver, Alice Weaver
-
I cannot express in words all that Christian Science...
Beatrice Naomi Monks
-
The quotation, "Freely ye have received, freely give,"...
Sue Kerlin Poulterer
-
Christian Science is the most wonderful inspiration that...
Myrtle Irene Bennett
-
In September, 1915, I persuaded my husband to get me a...
Grace K. Shannon with contributions from William R. Shannon
-
Many years ago Christian Science was brought to my...
Stella J. Hamlin
-
For over ten years I suffered from nervousness, said to...
D. Sidney Puneky
-
It is now seventeen years since I first began the study of...
Lilly J. Stewart with contributions from Maria Harrison
-
From the Press
with contributions from Helen Bosanquet, W. A. Cunningham Craig
-
Notices
with contributions from The Christian Science Publishing Society