Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
In a published sermon are some statements which indicate...
Pasadena (Cal.) Star
In a published sermon are some statements which indicate the difficulty men face in the endeavor to reconcile the presence of evil, or sin, in a world created by a wholly good God. This difficulty has always faced mankind, and in the endeavor to solve it there has been produced a vast volume of literature. Indeed it may be said that the intellectual efforts of the human race to solve this problem have resulted in the production of a greater number of books than have been produced on any other subject. There are but two positions which can be taken in this matter, and a choice must be made between the two. Either God created and permits evil and sin, in which case sin is eternal and unescapable, or else God did not create it, does not know of it, cannot be said to permit it, and therefore man can free himself from it.
It may be of interest to many of the readers of the Star to know of the position of Christian Science as to the reality or actuality of evil and sin. Christian Science teaches that God made all that was made; that what God has made is real and true and eternal; that this creation is wholly good, and contains nothing which does not partake of the nature or attributes of God. Christian Science teaches that the whole arena of the seeming activity of sin is in the human mind, and that a sinful act is the result of sinful or wrong thought; that the thought always precedes the act, and therefore the remedy for sin is a correction of the thought which produces sin.
The Christian Scientist does not ignore sin, but in his denial of it he means that he refuses to admit the truth of any statement that sin is real because it emanates from God, or that God is in any way responsible for sin. It will be noted, therefore, that this denial is based on the positive affirmation that sin can be no part of the nature or creation of God. The Christian Scientist does not assume from this that he is a better man than his neighbor; he only knows that as contrasted with his own past he is better man because of the teachings of Christian Science. He does not compare himself with other individuals; he only compares his present experiences with his past experiences.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
May 6, 1916 issue
View Issue-
Making Knowledge Practical
SAMUEL GREENWOOD
-
"The guest of God"
WINIFRED M. BENJAMIN
-
Operating Unspent
PERCY PHILLIP VYLE
-
Divine Manifestation
ISRAEL PICKENS
-
Working for the Church
ANNA W. HOLLEBAUGH
-
Having Other Gods
ELDO STEDFELD
-
Teaching in the Sunday School
AIMÉE E. FRALEY
-
Climbing
KATE L. CRUMP
-
In a published sermon are some statements which indicate...
Henry Van Arsdale
-
A reverend critic of Christian Science attempts to prove...
J. Arnold Haughton
-
In an issue of your paper a clergyman has taken occasion...
John L. Rendall
-
With reference to the article "The Great Denial," in no...
Charles W. J. Tennant
-
The Fifth Commandment
Archibald McLellan
-
The "Word" that Heals
Annie M. Knott
-
The Way of Ascent
John B. Willis
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
with contributions from John V. Dittemore
-
The Lectures
with contributions from D. C. Arthur, Walter Wilding, James N. Russell
-
I would like to express my gratitude for what Christian Science...
Charity Brubaker
-
At the time of my healing through Christian Science I was...
Horace W. Baker
-
At the end of 1911 my health was most unsatisfactory
Katey Godfrey
-
In June, 1914, a Christian Science practitioner came to...
Mary E. Gordon
-
To me it seems a privilege to give thanks to our heavenly...
Vesta Hinkley Moore
-
For four years I suffered from what was pronounced an...
Gladys Parvin
-
About a year and a half ago I became acquainted with the...
Theodor Loeben
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from Canon Alexander