Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
In a recent issue I find under the caption, "The Bible and...
The Fairfield (Iowa) Journal
In a recent issue I find under the caption, "The Bible and Christian Science," the full text of a sermon delivered by a clergyman, in which he presents his opinion of what Christian Science teaches. He states, "We shall for the most part treat the subject by the deadly parallel method." The critic's method certainly kills every sense of justice and truth, and distorts, perverts, and misrepresents as no other method possibly could do. For one to take a passage from Science and Health, and regardless of its significance in relation to its context, arbitrarily to dispute it with a carefully selected Bible quotation likewise used regardless of its context, is about as inexcusable a method of "enlightenment" as could be devised.
In following the quotations made from Science and Health as given in the report of this sermon, and reading them in connection with their context, I find that the significance given by the critic is in most instances a positive perversion of what these passages are really intended to convey. I will cite one instance which illustrates my meaning. The clergyman states, "The Bible teaches the reality of sin: 'By one man sin entered into the world.' Christian Science says, 'Sin is but an illusion.'" The latter statement in its completeness, as found on page 480 of Science and Health, is as follows: "God, or good, never made man capable of sin. It is the opposite of good—that is, evil—which seems to make men capable of wrong-doing. Hence, evil is but an illusion, and it has no real basis. Evil is a false belief. God is not its author. The supposititious parent of evil is a lie."
Because of the limitations of space it is impossible for me to take every quotation made by our critic and give its context, but suffice it to say that were I to do so, it could be clearly shown that he has no fair or legitimate Christian reason for his attack on Christian Science. It is true that Christian Scientists have a different concept of theology than that which he entertains, and it is true that they take a different position with regard to what constitutes reality. It is also true that in Christian Science, demonstration is requisite to the acceptance of any teaching as real and true.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
April 18, 1914 issue
View Issue-
Honesty in Business
SAMUEL GREENWOOD
-
Health Legislation
JUDGE CLIFFORD P. SMITH
-
The Rock of Truth
GRACE SQUIRES
-
"Shibboleth"
CHARLES T. ROOT
-
Divine Intelligence Ever Available
HELEN G. YERGER
-
Fidelity
JAMES N. HATCH
-
Considerable interest seems to have been aroused by the...
Albert E. Miller
-
Jesus once said, "By their fruits ye shall know them."...
John H. Wheeler
-
In a recent issue I find under the caption, "The Bible and...
John L. Rendall
-
Assurance
TEDA M. EARLE
-
"Holy to the Lord"
Archibald McLellan
-
One Good versus One Evil
John B. Willis
-
Light
Annie M. Knott
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
with contributions from John V. Dittemore
-
The Lectures
with contributions from W. Morris Deisher, Colonel Carter, O.L. Parsons, Malcolm C. Hopper, Arthur N. Gibb, Algernon Hervey Bathurst
-
That Christian Science is equal to the solution of every...
Helen L. T. Badgley
-
In the winter of 1908 I had a severe attack of influenza
Marie Triebel
-
In the summer of 1912 I was taken with severe nervous...
Natalie Lorcher
-
It is with a deep sense of gratitude that I give this testimony
Ida Wood with contributions from Anna Corneau
-
Three years ago I turned to Christian Science for physical...
Adele C. Ferguson
-
I wish to express my thankfulness to God for the good...
Etta A. Peaslee with contributions from W. T. Hewett
-
Rejoice
SAMUEL JOHNSTONE MACDONALD
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from W. Duxbury Woods, John S. Bunting