Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
In a recent issue a writer refers to the sermon lately...
Kent Messenger and Ashford Examiner
In a recent issue a writer refers to the sermon lately preached by the Vicar of Tenterden on Christian Science. Will you kindly permit me to emphasize one part of his argument while explaining another, and then to make a demand, in the most public way possible, on the vicar himself? First, I should like to emphasize that part of his letter in which he points out that if the vicar's argument is sound, he is engaged in blowing himself out of the water simultaneously with Christian Scientists. Second, may I explain that the vicar's prejudices constitute miserably frail premises for the consideration of Christian Science. Christian Science certainly teaches that an understanding of spiritual law, and an attempt to live in complete obedience to it, will be found to embody a knowledge of the truth which Jesus the Christ said would free the world. It does not, however, ask humanity to accept this as a dogma to be proved after death. It asks it to accept it as a working hypothesis to be demonstrated, as Jesus demonstrated it himself, and demanded that it should be demonstrated by his followers, when he said, "He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also." This surely makes a man's claim to Christianity dependent on and in proportion to his fulfilment of Jesus' own requirement.
Christian Scientists accept this demand unequivocally for themselves, and everybody has got to do the same who is not going to run away from the obvious meaning of the Bible. It is utter nonsense to say that they blame their neighbors for their failures, and only proves that critics like the Vicar of Tenterden have not read the book they are attacking. Here is what Mrs. Eddy does say, on page 149 of the Christian Science text-book, "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures": "If you fail to succeed in any case, it is because you have not demonstrated the life of Christ, Truth, more in your own life,—because you have not obeyed the rule and proved the Principle of divine Science." The propaganda of Christian Science amounts to this, that Christian Scientists say: Here is a teaching which we have individually accepted in theory, and found to be demonstrable in practise, therefore we naturally believe in it. If you are in trouble, moral, mental, or physical, and have failed to find help, you might, as we did, examine and test it, to see if, as we did, you may not find help in it. This is not, however, enough for the Vicar of Tenterden; he must be the arbiter of truth for the parish, and whatever he decides against must be cast out. I hope the bishops of his church are prepared for the crusade in which he has assumed the role of Peter the Hermit.
And now may I publicly demand from him, and I have a right publicly to demand this as he has publicly committed himself to the statements, where in Mrs. Eddy's writings he finds the quotations printed in his Parish Magazine, in inverted commas, in these words: "But Mrs. Eddy rejects the church; 'My church is the only church, the other church is an unclean thing.'" The readers of his magazine have taken the last part of this sentence as a quotation from Mrs. Eddy, and that is what the construction of the sentence implies. Worse than this, writing of the sacrament, he says, "Christ says, 'Do this in remembrance of me;' Mrs. Eddy says, 'Do not do this in remembrance of him.'" Will the vicar say where in Mrs. Eddy's writings he finds the two quotations put into her mouth, and placed deliberately as quotations within quotation marks?
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
August 16, 1913 issue
View Issue-
A NECESSARY EXCHANGE
CLARENCE W. CHADWICK.
-
DEMONSTRATION
KATE TREVER RONEY.
-
OBEDIENCE
A. B. FICHTER.
-
"IN A DESERT PLACE."
J. NONISH.
-
GLORIFYING GOD
FRANCES M. GORRELL.
-
AN EXPERIENCE
HANSON W. WHEELER.
-
In a recent issue a writer refers to the sermon lately...
Frederick Dixon
-
The writer in your columns who asks the question, "If...
Paul Stark Seeley
-
Our critic objects to the Christian Science statement...
Harry I. Hunt
-
I have read with considerable interest the report of the...
Algernon Hervey Bathurst
-
I have read with interest in a recent issue of the Courier...
John L. Rendall
-
The Rev. R. J. Wade, in a sermon reported in a recent...
R. Stanhope Easterday
-
WHY DISCRIMINATE?
Archibald McLellan
-
THE WAYSHOWER
John B. Willis
-
SCIENTIFIC RULES
Annie M. Knott
-
THE LECTURES
with contributions from Eugene C. Pearman, Alfred G. Potts, John F. Braun, Hollis J. Backus, Howard O. Sprogle, George Anderson, H. Swire, Frank L. Moore, C. L. Yearick
-
My heart overflows with love to God, and gratitude to...
S. McCue Smith
-
To say that I am grateful for what Christian Science has...
K. Hall with contributions from Fred Hall
-
The few times that I have given my testimony at a...
Louise K. Eppich
-
For the many blessings received during the last eight...
Orien F. Narveson
-
At least twenty-five years ago Christian Science was very...
Grace Fletcher King
-
For many years I was a student of the Bible and an...
John W. Boehr
-
Before relating the following experience, I would like to...
Marcia Eddy Stowe
-
I want to express my appreciation of the many helpful...
Lillian N. Lange
-
I cannot find words with which to express my gratitude...
Martha C. Fisher with contributions from Oliver Wilkes Fisher
-
For two days I had suffered from an ole ailment, namely...
M. A. Wilson with contributions from Lincoln
-
FROM OUR EXCHANGES
W. E. Orchard