Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Right Condemnation
When Jesus said to his disciples, "Condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned," he set before them a great duty and the possibility of a great reward. Christians evidently have not realized the full meaning of this statement of Jesus, or the way to obey it; for nothing seems more rife in the world to-day than personal condemnation. Many men condemn their neighbors, and yet all men desire not to be condemned by their neighbors. One reason why men have failed to understand the way to stop condemning their fellows is that everything has been considered from a strictly personal standpoint.
Feeling convinced that all that is wrong deserves condemnation, and seeing their neighbor indulging in wrong, how could it be possible to condemn the sin without condemning the sinner? Because of this question mankind has been thrown into extremes,—it has either condemned the sinner without mercy, or it has gone to the other extreme and practically condoned the sin. Christian Science explains the teaching of Jesus on this subject in so wonderful and withal in so simple a manner that, when universally accepted and practiced, all the world will be able to rejoice in the overcoming of one of the worst foes to human peace and progress.
In the first place, Christian Science shows that the place where this foe—personal condemnation—must be overcome is in each individual consciousness, since there is where all one's sinning as well as one's condemnation of sin goes on. Christian Science says: Condemn sin, but not the sinner; and then goes on to explain how this is to be done. It recognizes the impossibility of separating the sinner from his sin so long as the latter is consciously and willfully indulged; for, as Mrs. Eddy says positively in "Retrospection and Introspection" (p. 64): "You cannot separate the sin from the sinner, nor the sinner from his sin. The sin is the sinner, and vice versa, for such is the unity of evil." It also shows that this applies primarily to the one sinning. Indulging a sin, one must always acknowledge that he is the sinner; for it can be readily seen that the instant the sinner recognizes and forsakes his sin there can be neither sin nor sinner so far as that individual and that specific claim of evil are concerned.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
June 10, 1922 issue
View Issue-
Annual Meeting of The Mother Church
with contributions from Harvey S. Chase, Irving C. Tomlinson, Fred M. Lamson, Wm. P. Mckenzie, James E. Patton, Albert F. Gilmore
-
A kindly critic in a recent issue of your paper states of...
Harry K. Filler, Committee on Publication for the State of Ohio,
-
Christian Scientists accept the teaching of the Bible...
Olive Austin, Committee on Publication for Warwick County, England,
-
The place accorded to "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures"...
Edwin C. Buck, Committee on Publication for the State of New Hampshire,
-
The definition of pantheism, according to Webster, is:...
W. K. Primrose
-
May I correct the erroneous impression given out in the...
J. G. Rowell, Committee on Publication for the State of Missouri,
-
The Higher Demonstration
Albert F. Gilmore
-
"The divine method of pardon"
Duncan Sinclair
-
Right Condemnation
Ella W. Hoag
-
The Lectures
with contributions from David A. Giel, Ruth Clement Hoyer
-
Many years ago I sent a testimony to The Christian Science Journal...
Elizabeth S. Thornton
-
I have had many proofs of the perfect law of Love as...
Robert L. Sawyer
-
Through the healing of an instructor at the Art Institute...
Florence Davis Keller
-
I have great cause at this time to rejoice at having a little...
Bertram Goodwin
-
In 1907, after several years of suffering from nervous...
Georgie B. Finty
-
Three years ago, after an attack of pneumonia, I was...
Annie E. Machon
-
In 1907, when I first began the reading of "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures,"...
Willard D. Moon
-
The spring of 1917 found me hampered by the effects...
Charlotte C. Loomis
-
Signs of the Times
with contributions from Edgar S. Brightman, Charles A. Ellwood, Bosanquet, Florence E. Allen