Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
In a recent issue is an account of a talk by a clergyman at...
Shreveport (La.) Times
In a recent issue is an account of a talk by a clergyman at a Bible conference, in the course of which talk he takes occasion to express his opinion of Christian Science. If one understands a subject, he can demonstrate its rule; but failing in this, he should not find fault with those who are demonstrating it. Christian Science means right living and right doing, and as the thought is father to the act, it follows that a man must necessarily think right in order to act right. If our clerical critic is doing this, he is to this extent a Christian Scientist.
When it is alleged that the teaching of Christian Science is "a foe to the home" and that "it locks its heart against suffering humanity," we are forced to ask where our critic has found justification for his contention. Is it possible that a religion which has had the largest growth of any movement of modern times, whose members are numbered among the world's best citizens, and whose history has been that its churches are soon outgrown and larger ones become necessary to accommodate those who crowd its pews in search of its message of healing,—is it possible that such a religion can be a detriment to mankind?
Some expression of the public thought in this connection is afforded by the following extract from an editorial which appeared in a paper recently: "Our lives are no longer measured by our own individual standards; we look beyond our own cramped environments and try to see others as they see themselves, and not as they appear to our narrow and often selfish vision. The sincerity of the Christian Scientist is not to be questioned. The Scientists are entitled to their belief; they are entitled to the happiness and comfort it gives them, and it is a notable sign of the advance of civilization that those who disagree, dogmatically or otherwise, with the Christian Scientists, are unwilling to interfere with the development of the church."
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
April 4, 1914 issue
View Issue-
Superstition versus Science
HON. CLARENCE A. BUSKIRK
-
Universal Consideration
JOSEPH W. REYNOLDS
-
"Break up your fallow ground"
ETHEL MUNRO GOSS
-
Good Always Available
EDITH B. M. YOUNG
-
Practical Value of Christian Science
ALFRED THORPE
-
"Why weepest thou?"
J. THOMAS MUMFORD
-
The minister who has found time to condemn Christian Science...
Paul Stark Seeley
-
Our critic laments that Christian Science teaches something...
R. Stanhope Easterday
-
Christian Science does not teach that sickness and sin are...
Frank C. Barrett
-
We notice in a recent issue of your paper that Dr....
Willis D. McKinstry
-
Resurrection
EDMUND K. GOLDSBOROUGH
-
True Happiness
Archibald McLellan
-
Freedom from the Letter
John B. Willis
-
The Fourth Commandment
Annie M. Knott
-
The Lectures
with contributions from W. F. Stanton, Clarence H. Howard, Elbert S. Barlow, J. P. Moorhead, Alfred J. Wilson, C. S. Crawford
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
John V. Dittemore
-
If any one has reason to be thankful to God for Christian Science,...
C. T. Beiderbecke
-
More than a year ago, after having suffered for many...
Edith M. Goodrich
-
In July, 1910, I was taken very ill with blood-poisoning...
Emil Kuhn with contributions from S. M. Swallow
-
In December, 1912, my four-year-old son was taken ill...
Bertha Megwinoff
-
Christian Science has relieved me from the fear expressed...
Henry G. Kruke
-
Until a year and a half ago I never knew what it...
Faith Aileen Neville
-
When the first message of Christian Science came to me,...
Jennie Purcell Scott
-
A feeling of deep gratitude prompts me to testify to the...
Sophie Ganter with contributions from Mary J. Elmendorf
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from Henry Utterwich