Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
In denouncing a public display of views on religious subjects...
Tribune-Republican
In denouncing a public display of views on religious subjects not in accord with his own, a speaker quoted in a recent issue goes out of his way to indulge in a number of irrelevant and inaccurate references to Mrs. Eddy and Christian Science. To classify Mrs. Eddy with those who have undertaken to "build a new faith" or to discuss her capability in that respect, is not justifiable, for the reason that Mrs. Eddy never pretended to do such a thing. Christian Science was given to the world as a restatement of vital but neglected phases of primitive Christianity, and it is so accepted by all who understand it.
Instead of being "alike in method" to those with whom our friend has mistakenly assigned her in his discourse, it should be said of Mrs. Eddy that, whereas the others referred to have sought to set up systems at best merely doctrinal or theoretical, her writings and teachings are characterized by her insistence on the value of demonstrable knowledge, as compared with professional faith or belief. Her contribution to mankind is a method by which the scientific efficacy of religion is brought within the range of individual proof. Thus the genuine Christian Scientist strives to be, not one who believes good, but one who knows and does good.
In the magnitude of its first half century the Christian Science movement is of itself the best answer to the suggestion that its Founder's system was destructive rather than constructive. Those who reject her teachings will not admit she has destroyed anything for them, and her followers are unanimously of the opinion that all that has been destroyed in their case was the veriest mental rubbish ; whereas, constructively, Christian Science has done wonders for them. There is no reason for associating Mrs. Eddy with those who have laid claim to exclusive or monopolistic revelations. That sort of thing is especially repudiated by Christian Science, which contends for the universality and impersonality of truth.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
November 28, 1914 issue
View Issue-
What Jesus Came to Save
SAMUEL GREENWOOD
-
Tenderness of Might
MARY I. MESECHRE
-
Progress
DUNCAN SINCLAIR, B.SC.
-
Believing Good to be True
MYRTLE B. S. JACKSON
-
Cleaning Our Own Windows
SARAH E. COX
-
In a recent issue is a statement regarding Christian Science...
Algernon Hervey Bathurst
-
In a recent issue, the Rev. Mr.—, in a sermon entitled...
Ezra W. Palmer
-
The Rev. Mr.—, according to a report of his recent...
R. Stanhope Easterday
-
My attention has been called to your kindly notice about...
John W. Doorly
-
Christian Science as an antidote for seasickness is made...
Paul Stark Seeley
-
Reference to the alleged methods of Christian Scientists...
George Shaw Cook
-
The Pilot
GERTRUDE RING HOMANS
-
One and Indivisible
Archibald McLellan
-
Greetings
Annie M. Knott
-
Consciousness and Capacity
John B. Willis
-
The Lectures
with contributions from A. C. McHenry, Edmund F. Burton, W. Ernest Dickson, A. O. Freel, Arthur Huertly, J. C. Millbourne
-
In June, 1909, when I was away at sea, my wife had a...
Reginald Raby
-
The testimonies in the Christian Science periodicals have...
Patti McMillin
-
It is six years since my attention was directed to Christian Science,...
John Milroy Lamb with contributions from R. H. Lamb
-
It is about fifteen years since I first heard of Christian Science
Barbara S. Banham
-
Two years have elapsed since some dear relatives called my...
Flora Bohensky-Clerk
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from Herbert E. Ryle, David J. Burrell