Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Lest some one should be misled by our clerical critic's...
Toledo (Iowa) Democrat
Lest some one should be misled by our clerical critic's perversion of the Christian Science definition of God, let me here state unequivocally that Christian Science teaches but "one God, the Father, of whom are all things." Our critic states, "According to Mrs. Eddy, God is not a person, but an influence, a principle." This statement betrays the most superficial sort of reasoning. Were he more familiar with Christian Science, he would understand that when Mrs. Eddy defines God as Principle, she clearly and scientifically recognizes Him to be the one Principle, Mind, Spirit by reason of which all things are and have their origin and existence. In her Message of 1901 to The Mother Church, Mrs. Eddy states (p. 4):—
"We understand that God is personal in a scientific sense, but is not corporeal nor anthropomorphic. We understand that God is not finite; He is the infinite Person, but not three persons in one person. Christian Scientists are theists and monotheists. Those who misjudge us because we understand that God is the infinite One instead of three, should be able to explain God's personality rationally. Christian Scientists consistently conceive of God as One because He is infinite; and as triune, because He is Life, Truth, Love, and these three are one in essence and in office.
"If in calling God 'divine Principle,' meaning divine Love, more frequently than Person, we merit the epithet 'godless,' we naturally conclude that he breaks faith with his creed, or has no possible conception of ours, who believes that three persons are defined strictly by the word Person, or as One; for if Person is God, and he believes three persons constitute the Godhead, does not Person here lose the nature of one God, lose monotheism, and become less coherent than the Christian Scientist's sense of Person as one divine infinite triune Principle, named in the Bible Life, Truth, Love?—for each of these possesses the nature of all, and God omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient."
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
October 4, 1913 issue
View Issue-
Happiness
WILLARD S. MATTOX
-
Distribution of Literature
ALBERT E. MILLER
-
An Appreciation
CHARLES K. MILLER
-
True Reform
BRIGMAN C. ODOM
-
"My burden is light"
MARY THORN
-
Material Thought Silenced
MARY HICKS VAN DER BURGH
-
Divine Allness
SIDNEY B. COHEN
-
There is a great deal in a point of view
Fredrick Dixon
-
Lest some one should be misled by our clerical critic's...
John L. Rendall
-
Mrs. Eddy does not claim to have originated one iota of...
R. Stanhope Easterday
-
One reason advanced by our critic why he could "not be...
John H. Wheeler
-
A Dual Mission
Archibald McLellan
-
From the Passing to the Permanent
John B. Willis
-
Apparel
Annie M. Knott
-
Admission to Membership in The Mother Church
John V. Dittemore
-
The Lectures
with contributions from John W. Doorly, DeWitt McMurray, Allison G. Holland, Cairo Trimble
-
In the gospel of Luke the Master speaks of the debtor the...
B. Palmer Lewis
-
I am a Norwegian and have been in America a number of...
Marie Eriksen
-
Christian Science, as presented to the world by Mrs. Eddy...
Wallace H. Brainerd with contributions from Bessie M. Brainerd
-
Some eighteen months ago I was taken ill with so-called...
Marta Heitzmann
-
Kindness
CHARLES C. SANDELIN
-
From Our Exchanges
W. E. Orchard