The statement of our clerical critic, that the faith or...

Kingston (Ont.) Standard

The statement of our clerical critic, that the faith or philosophy of Christian Science is "a false philosophy," is based on an entirely erroneous concept of what Christian Science really teaches. He admits that there is much good in Christian Science, and as this good is the direct outcome of its teachings, the teachings cannot be false, as he seems to think. The important premises of Christian Science are that "God is All-in-all" and "God is Spirit" (Science and Health, pp. 113 and 117); and every statement contained in the text-book of Christian Science, "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" by Mrs. Eddy, is consistent with these premises. It is quite possible that what may appear to a critic as inconsistent in Christian Science, will be found on a further study to be entirely consistent.

The abstract statement that matter, sin, sickness, and death are unreal, does not fully express the teaching of Christian Science on these subjects. Christian Scientists apply the word reality only to those things that are created by God, Spirit, and that are, therefore, indestructible and eternal. This use of the term is in line with Paul's statement that "the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal." That Jesus did not believe in the reality of sickness and sin is shown by the fact that he destroyed them whenever he came in contact with them. Had they been real and God-created, they would have been eternal, and Jesus could not have destroyed them. As everything that God made was pronounced to be "very good," and He made all that really exists, then if God created sin and sickness, they must be "very good," and Jesus would not have attempted their destruction, since we are told that he went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed with the devil.

April 6, 1912

We'd love to hear from you!

Easily submit your testimonies, articles, and poems online.