Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Contrary to the remarks of a revivalist recently published...
Tribune
Contrary to the remarks of a revivalist recently published in your paper, "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" by Mary Baker Eddy agrees entirely with the Bible on the definitions of God, sin, the atonement, and creation. When understood, it is inconceivable that any should take issue with Christian Science on these subjects. We not only ascribe to God all power, but know God to be the only power. He created all. "All things were made by him." What He created was completely and wholly good: "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good." Thus, to Christian Scientists God is supreme and infinite good.
As to sin, all agree that it is not good; therefore, God is not its author. Then why ascribe might, power, or intelligence to something that has never been? Christian Scientists do not. This does not mean that they close their eyes to the claims of evil. That evil appears to exist and to human sense seems very real, Christian Scientists recognize; but they handle it by knowing that they cannot be harmed by things never created.
From the established fact that God created all, a perfect creation logically follows. In the case of man, this is made specific by the Biblical statement that "God created man in his own image." To be the image of God man cannot be less than perfect. But the Bible requires that we distinguish between spiritual man of God's creating and the so-called human, mortal, or carnal, which, we are told in Romans, is enmity against God, and cannot please Him. Therefore, in Christian Science, we accept as the real man the spiritual, and insist that "this mortal ... put on immortality."
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
February 16, 1924 issue
View Issue-
Giving
HENRY H. LINDSEY
-
"The manna of to-day"
LOUISE M. MARTIN
-
The Peacemaker
REGINA B. M. NASH
-
Science, versus Theory
RUTH POWELL WENBAN
-
"There is therefore now no condemnation"
JESSIE G. SINCLAIR
-
Identity and Individuality
LONGLEY TAYLOR
-
Rest
HAZEL A. WOOD
-
Weaving
MARY I. MESECHRE
-
The message of Christian Science is one of hope, joy,...
John Ormston Thomson, Committee on Publication for Victoria, Australia,
-
Contrary to the remarks of a revivalist recently published...
Richard Herbert Smith, Committee on Publication for Montana,
-
Jesus of Nazareth used no drugs, nor did he recommend...
Hugh Stuart Campbell, Committee on Publication for the State of Illinois,
-
The Cause of Christian Science has thrived under the...
W. Stuart Booth, Committee on Publication for Colorado,
-
Christian Science teaches that God being infinite Spirit...
Charles W. J. Tennant, District Manager of Committees on Publication for Great Britain and Ireland,
-
Statement from the Directors Regarding the Relief Funds
The Christian Science Board of Directors with contributions from Baron Ijuin
-
Be Not Afraid
Albert F. Gilmore
-
Innocence
Duncan Sinclair
-
"The song of Christian Science"
Ella W. Hoag
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Bliss Knapp , Horace C. Jenkins, Arnold F. Fylpaa, W. Barrett, Josephine Hidy
-
After years spent in the fruitless study of various philosophies...
Eunice F. Maurer
-
Ever since I was old enough to read the Bible, the fact...
E. Wilhelmina Jimmerson
-
It is about fourteen years since Christian Science was...
Julia L. LaBar
-
In July, 1917, I joined two friends, purposing to spend...
Ada Blanche Taylor
-
After the birth of our second child, through carelessness...
Florence Hoerner
-
It is indeed a privilege to add my testimony to the already...
Elizabeth Pfister
-
In 1919 I was plastering a residence when I fell off...
William R. Steadman
-
God Changeth Not
CLARA TEWKSBURY WATSON
-
Signs of the Times
with contributions from Samuel Sachs, H. S. Curr, Royal S. Copeland, L. Clare Davis