Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
A letter published in your paper contained the following...
New Haven (Conn.) Journal—Courier
A letter published in your paper contained the following statements: "I have a hearty admiration for the Christian Scientist who can actually make himself believe there is no pain when his body is racked by it. He is either heroic or self—hypnotic."
Notwithstanding that this was intended to be commendatory, it reveals the somewhat prevalent mistaken impression that Christian Science and hypnotism are akin to each other, when in fact they are in no way allied. Hypnotism is "of the flesh," the human, mortal mind, while Christian Science is "from above," spiritual. Hypnotism is the exercise of willpower, the mortal, or carnal mind as St. Paul termed it, and is capable of evil, all evil. Christian Science on the contrary is the operation of infinite intelligence or divine Mind, from which only good emanates. From this explanation it is readily discerned that there is no similarity between hypnotism and Christian Science.
The caption of the letter in queston is "Anent Sickness," and the writer forcefully points to the unprofitableness which results from allowing sickness to occupy the thought, and the unpleasant experiences which follow discussions upon disease. The implied recommendation is to look away from the dark side of things, cultivate cheerfulness and optimism, talk health not disease, and strive to eliminate fear from the thought. Christian Science furnishes the scientific rule for accomplishing this. In "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" (p. 582) Mrs. Eddy says of believing, that it is "not a faltering nor a blind faith, but the perception of spiritual Truth;" she also says (p. 167), "If we rise no higher than blind faith, the Science of healing is not attained."
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
July 29, 1916 issue
View Issue-
Religion Made Practical
CLARENCE W. CHADWICK
-
The Practical and the Ideal
SADIE KIEKINTVELD
-
The Key to the Kingdom
JULIA S. KINNEY
-
Daily Blessings
HENRIETTE BALLU
-
Gratitude Freely Expressed
J. LOUISE CARTER
-
Preparation
PETER B. BIGGINS
-
Sunshine everywhere!...
Katherine T. Porter
-
The criticism that "Christian Science is neither Christian...
Charles M. Shaw
-
Your account of a professor's lecture on archaeology in...
Virgil H. Clymer
-
There appeared in a recent issue of your paper a review...
Warren O. Evans
-
In the columns of your paper is given a report of a sermon...
W. D. Kilpatrick
-
Perhaps the principal cause of our reverend critic's failure...
Carl E. Herring
-
The "whole gospel"
Archibald Mclellan
-
Reflection
Annie M. Knott
-
No Real Resistance to Truth
William D. McCrackan
-
The Lectures
with contributions from E. C. Thomas, Fred W. Indermille, Campbell MacCulloch, W. S. Levens, Charles Franklin, G. F. Hills, W. E. Morgan
-
In the hope of encouraging others I send the following...
Evelyn G. Browning
-
Several years ago I had an experience which convinced...
Samuel B. Lightcap
-
I first came in contact with practical Christianity several...
Caroline M. Cox
-
Several years ago I was healed through Christian Science...
Ella Belle Keen
-
I was healed by Christian Science of what was pronounced...
Albert C. Shrewsbury
-
I am very glad to be able to tell my fellow men of the many...
Bernhard Hempel
-
About four years ago I was healed in Christian Science of a...
Frances I. Terrill
-
Words are inadequate to express my gratitude for what...
Helen Veneman
-
From Our Exchanges
with contributions from W. H. P. Faunce