Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Spurious Literature
Many friends who have become interested in Christian Science having previously read spurious literature on the subject, find it a great stumbling-block when asked to read nothing but the authorized literature. They immediately question it, and see no reason why the beautifully worded phrases they have been reading should be considered useless to their growth in grace. I have been asked to explain the difference many times, and I wish to suggest one of the points which has proven to be most helpful in showing. the difference, and in pointing out why such literature is hurtful.
Being completely unfamiliar with such literature myself, save as inquiring friends have made plain what they have gleaned therefrom, my answers do not by any means completely cover the question, but surely reading Science and Health will, if we search faithfully.

October 5, 1899 issue
View Issue-
The First American Printing-Press
BY ERNEST INGERSOLL
-
Wanted—A Benevolent Germ
with contributions from C.
-
"The Spinning-Wheel at Rest"
with contributions from Lee, Shepard, Edward A. Jenks
-
Regarding Science and Health
Editor
-
Mr. Tomlinson Relieved
Editor
-
A Statement of Facts
Editor
-
Euthanasia
Editor
-
Our Leader
Editor with contributions from Livingston Mims, Alfred Farlow, Wm. P. McKenzie
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Eva A. Loomis, Ruth Lanham, George N. Beels, Frank H. Mott
-
Spurious Literature
BY ANDREA H. PROUDFOOT
-
Familiar Texts Explained
BY L. H. JONES
-
A Voice from Nova Scotia
BY C. A. MCLEOD
-
Development
C.
-
A Japanese Legend
BY IDA REED SMITH
-
Questions and Answers
L. C. R.
-
Omnipotence
B. A. Miller with contributions from Ruskin
-
Notices
with contributions from William B. Johnson