Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
In answering the criticism on Christian Science given by...
Cleburne (Tex.) Morning Review
In answering the criticism on Christian Science given by an evangelist, I should like to make the following statements:—
Christian Scientists do not deny that sin exists as a material sense phenomenon, but they do deny that it is real in the sense that it is God-ordained. They see it as a false belief, a lie, an illusion of human sense. In its broad sense, anything out of harmony with divine law is either sin or the result of sin. Sin is a belief in other gods, a belief in other powers, a belief in something apart from God. This belief violates the First Commandment, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." In dealing with sin, therefore, one's sense of it is that with which he must grapple. This false sense is overcome through the realization of the omnipresence and omnipotence of God. Sin, thus understood and overcome, is destroyed, or forgiven. It might be added that so long as one believes in sin and indulges it, so long to him does its penalty last.
Christian Scientists are reputable, intelligent, law-abiding citizens. It can be said of them, too, that they endeavor to be Christians. They believe in wholesome education; they are charitable, enterprising, and progressive; they are Christian Scientists because Christian Science has given them a better view of life than they had before. Christian Science appeals to them because, as religion, it offers help at all times and under all circumstances. It does not tell one that he should do right or live right and leave him there; it tells him how to do it.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
April 29, 1922 issue
View Issue-
Thoughts
FRANCES MACK MANN
-
Doing, Not Trying to Do
MARTHA ADELAIDE HOLTON
-
Meekness is Might
ANNE VAN VEEN-EYKELBOOM
-
"Moulding and chiseling thought"
STANLEY BRIGHTMORE
-
"A time to break down"
CORNELIA MOORE
-
Scientific Right Thinking
SARAH M. DAVIS
-
In order that Christian Science may properly be distinguished...
Aaron E. Brandt
-
In answering the criticism on Christian Science given by...
Brigman C. Odom
-
In a recent edition of the Journal an article appeared...
Peter B. Biggins
-
Church Building in Christian Science
Anna Friendlich
-
On Seeing the Father
Albert F. Gilmore
-
Vision
Duncan Sinclair
-
One Perfect Premise
Ella W. Hoag
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Eva Lassalle, J. Edwin Jensen
-
It is with love and gratitude to God that I write this...
Virda M. Hamilton
-
What does Christian Science mean to me?
Julia W. Thomas
-
About twelve years ago, on the invitation of a friend, I...
Elizabeth Shaw Mitchell
-
It gives me great pleasure to send the following testimony...
Jeannie G. Hunter
-
If we would realize that our testimony, however small,...
Helen R. Handy
-
I feel that I should add my testimony to the thousands...
Estelle F. Stanhope
-
It would be impossible to express in words my gratitude...
Elizabeth Trumbull
-
Recently I fell and sprained my ankle
Lucy M. Berg
-
I am so thankful for all that Christian Science has done...
Anna Kucera with contributions from Joseph M. Kucera
-
A scalding accident at the age of two years so shocked...
John Montgomery Turner with contributions from Jane Hall Turner
-
I am grateful to give my experience in Christian Science...
Lillian E. Little
-
I wish to testify to a beautiful healing
Leota Caruthers
-
Signs of the Times
with contributions from Angell of Yale, Mountford Mills, Alfred W. Martin, Percy Dearmer, Constance M. Coltman, John D. Barry
-
Notices
with contributions from Clerk of The Mother Church