Philip King, Committee on Publication for the District of Columbia,
For the information of your readers allow me space to correct a statement contained in an article appearing in your recent issue, wherein the writer classifies Christian Science as an occult science, along with spiritualism, mind reading, and astrology.
George C. Palmer, Committee on Publication for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada,
Judging from the article entitled "Religion of the Spirit" in your recent issue, it might appear that Dean Inge was not receptive to some of the indications of the more spiritual light breaking through the clouds of materialism on this side of the Atlantic, notwithstanding the fact that its softening influence is being felt in fields far from the American Continent.
August Fritsche, Committee on Publication for the State of Minnesota,
In regard to the letter which appeared in the Sunday Journal under the caption "Acceptance of Truth and Guides to That Truth," I wish to state that the subject touched upon is not a matter of personal opinion.
Harry L. Rhodes, Committee on Publication for the State of Kansas,
A doctor, in his review of "Medical Follies," before the Sunday Reading Club at the Sheldon Community house, referred to Christian Science among the "modern systems of healing" which "depart from scientific medical orthodoxy.
Charles W. J. Tennant, District Manager of Committees on Publication for Great Britain and Ireland,
In your recent issue there appears an article on "Faith Healing," in which the writer says that Christian Science advances "the extraordinary dogmatic view that disease is nonexistent except in the mind of the sinner.
Christian Science
promises so much that is of inestimable value to mankind that the human mind often temporarily rejects it for no other reason than that according to this so-called mind it is too good to be true.
It
is often only when stern necessity forces one to take an immediate stand for divine Principle that the word "now" becomes pregnant with meaning to us.