In the endeavor to present Christian Science as a "danger...

Wigan (England) Observer

In the endeavor to present Christian Science as a "danger to religion," a clergyman, as reported in your paper, gave to his listeners, as Christian Science teaching, something which was not only completely foreign to that teaching but even directly antithetical to it. To "seek to distract one's mind from pain by the suggestion that the pain or the sickness does not exist" may possibly fairly describe the operations of those who seek to cure by mental suggestion, but mental suggestion is the polar opposite of Christian Science practise, and nobody with even a rudimentary understanding of that practise could possibly mistake the one for the other.

If the basic truth of Christianity, the allness and omnipotence of God, is to be maintained, it becomes nothing else than a logical, intellectual, and moral impossibility to conceive that any positive power or presence or reality is in that opposite, since it would be a contradiction of God, good. If there has been found to be "only one great reality in the universe, namely, God Himself" (these are the reported words of the Bishop of London), then the asserted reality of that which would oppose and exclude this only reality must be in truth but a seeming, a false reality; in other words, an unreality. This positive truth and necessary corollary form the central and inflexible teaching of Christian Science, but no Christian Scientist is so foolish as to urge that evil, and its ultimate expression in human experience as physical or mental pain, is anything but real to mortal. consciousness. This would be mere deception and make-believe, the endeavor to establish as true that which one believes to be untrue. It is the method of those who use mental suggestion, and the method which the critic has so erroneously supposed to be that of Christian Science.

December 14, 1912
Contents

We'd love to hear from you!

Easily submit your testimonies, articles, and poems online.

Submit