In the Christian Science Bible Lesson

The Church to-day is exceedingly unfortunate in the interpretations of the ages of theological expressions from which they cannot free themselves, and the definition of words of necessary use, making it almost impossible to read into them now their real meaning as used from the modern pulpit.
Christian Science, though founded upon the Bible, does not come to establish a new sect, even if some who adhere to sects may say so.
The attack on Christian Scientists, their Leader and belief, by a minister of this city, is regrettable as showing the intolerance of the orthodox clergy toward another denomination.

It has probably been the experience of almost every...

It has probably been the experience of almost every doctor of to-day to be asked by his patients for his opinion of Christian Science as a healing agency, and one would not be far wrong in saying that the fact that Christian Science practitioners do not consider it necessary to use the stethoscope and thermometer and other means of ascertaining the actual physical condition which they propose to relieve, is considered by the majority of doctors to be a full and sufficient reason for declaring that the cures cannot be genuine.

SPIRITUAL TRANSFORMATION

We are told that "the fossil forest of the Yellowstone Park is a mountain composed of layers of a greenish sandstone, containing the trunks of silicified trees," and that "shells, bones, corals, etc.

WORKING OUT OUR PROBLEM

Many students of Christian Science, as well as Christian people generally, make a mistake in attempting too much at the start, or rather in not rightly selecting the phase or manifestation of error over which they attempt to demonstrate at the beginning.
[A statement of the following very interesting case was sent to a popular magazine which has published the medical opinion that Christian Science has never healed any so-called organic diseases.
In his Thanksgiving proclamation President Roosevelt says :-

FROM OUR EXCHANGES

[Editorial in the Outlook, New York.
Our critic asks, as "the main point at issue," "Is Christian Science, so called, in harmony with the teachings of the Bible?
It must be patent to all thinking people that every movement touching the welfare of humanity must stand or fall absolutely upon the basis of its merits or demerits.
With wide differences of opinion and uncertainty among physicians with regard to diagnosis, the Christian Scientist, who trusts to God for his life and health, cannot be expected to rely or wait upon one diagnosis, which may be entirely different from that of another doctor of equal eminence and experience.