J. Latimer Davis, Committee on Publication for the State of Iowa,
A letter printed in the February 16 issue of your paper, under the heading "Christian Science Lecture Reviewed," although apparently written without intentional misrepresentation of Christian Science, nevertheless conveyed to your readers wrong impressions of that religion, and I should like to correct at least a few of the misleading statements it contained.
John T. Ferry, Committee on Publication for Western Australia,
In a recent issue of your paper, you quote from an address delivered by a doctor wherein he says, "Christian Science in one of its aspects is an organized system of quackery allied to religion.
Edgar McLeod, Committee on Publication for Northern California,
Recent issues of Emanu-El have contained some interesting letters regarding the racial and religious status of the Jew who has embraced Christian Science.
Charles W. J. Tennant, District Manager of Committees on Publication for Great Britain and Ireland,
Your readers must be grateful for the tolerance shown by the editorial in your issue of January 12, which deplored the deliberate raising of a religious controversy over a question in which the religious beliefs of those concerned should play no part, the Girl Guide movement being nonsectarian and undenominational.
THOSE
to whom the practicability of Christian Science has been revealed are fully assured that the understanding of God, divine Love, can be applied in everyday living to any particular task, with good and lasting results.
