Science and Immortality

The Boston Journal

Dr. William Osler, in his Ingersoll lecture on "Science and Immortality," finds nothing in scientific discoveries to buttress the idea of immortality. But, on the other hand, he finds nothing which disproves it. The most that he can say for himself is that he would rather be mistaken with Plato than be right with those who deny altogether the life after death.

But it need occasion no surprise that modern science finds no proof of immortality. The processes and the instruments of science are not fitted for such an investigation. It remains forever true that the things of the spirit are spiritually discerned. It is not to the telescope and the microscope but to the human consciousness that the appeal lies. The soul is not less real because its connection with the outward physical frame and its control over it remain inscrutable mysteries.

It is upon the sense that God is good and just, that this life is incomplete and full of inequity, that the soul has too great dignity and value to be extinguished at death, and that the craving for immortality would not have been implanted in the human heart if it were not to be satisfied, — upon these and upon whatever revelation is made to men through written words or spiritual communications, upon these and not upon the processes of science, the hope of immortality must rest.

Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.

February 11, 1905
Contents

We'd love to hear from you!

Easily submit your testimonies, articles, and poems online.

Submit