In a recent issue a visiting evangelist is quoted in opposition to the teaching of Christian Science concerning the unreality of sin, disease, and hell.
Referring to the communication of your correspondent "F," as printed in a recent issue, it appears that he has concluded to stand with your other correspondent, "Y," "against Christian Science.
In answer to an editorial in a recent issue, I would like to say that The Christian Science Monitor is not in politics, and does not advocate the views of any political party.
The Presbyterian Messenger, which brooks no contradiction in its columns to what is from time to time set before its readers as a representation of Christian Science, says that it "is to be abhorred, resting as it does on gross error.
It
was once decided to build a union terminal station for all the railroads in a certain city, and a site was selected which from the view-point of convenience was entirely suitable, but which in other ways presented so many natural obstacles to the enterprise that the reclaiming of it seemed, to the ordinary looker-on, a tremendous undertaking.
From
our youth upward our religious teachers have sought to impress upon us the vanity, the unsatisfying nature of all earthly things; but the unreality of these things had not yet dawned on human consciousness, and the pious words seemed to the listeners little else than a figure of speech.
In
the popular acceptation, the meaning of the word "time" is a sense of transition due to the rotation of the earth on its axis and to its revolution around the sun.
