Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
God the Saviour from all Ills
No one objects to the healing of sin by spiritual means alone, for the forgiveness of the sinner is the foundational belief of all Christian religions; and this result is sought without recourse to human devices or material aids. There is no monopoly in this redemptive work, no class legislation conferring this privilege on some conservative school of theology. The sin-sick man is allowed the freedom of choice or no choice at all, and if he dies apparently unforgiven, there is no outcry because he had no proper religious attendance.
Mortal man, with no resource outside of matter, is without a remedy for sin and is compelled by his extremity to seek salvation in God, Spirit, alone. He recognizes that sin is primarily a mental state and can therefore be reached only through mental or spiritual means. A physician would think the man demented who sought him for medical aid to cure dishonesty or hatred. In all materia medica he has no sedative to quiet a troubled conscience; no corrective that will remove the tendency to steal, or lie, or hate. But when continued indulgence of covetous and malicious thoughts has disturbed the harmony of bodily functions, the same physician, in all good faith, would dose him with his pills and poisons. If these drugs can remove the effects, why not the cause? and if they remove the effects and leave the cause still active, is the man healed?
The Christian world has based its theories of redemption from sin on the Scriptural promises of pardon, and though the ultimate result of their belief and prayer is beyond their ken, though they cannot know if the departed sinner has been admitted into paradise, they still hold to the efficacy and faithfulness of God's word. No one objects to this, except the infidel. There is no dismal protest that the day of moral miracles has passed, or that the Christ power which regenerated a Saul of Tarsus has not been operative since the apostolic age. But when Christian Scientists very lovingly suggest to their Christian brethren that we seek God for all good, and rely upon Him alone for the forgiveness of the sick man, they are met with skepticism and rejection. "Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life."
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
January 1, 1903 issue
View Issue-
Misunderstandings Corrected
John L. Rendall
-
The Higher Ministry of Christian Science
Albert E. Miller
-
Wrong Condemned
Edgar M'Leod
-
Against Paternalism
with contributions from Mark Hopkins
-
Power for the World's Work
A. E. Dolbear
-
The Lectures
with contributions from F. H. McMaster, John Franklin Crowell , George R. McKay, Silas C. Price, A. E. Jennings
-
MRS. EDDY TAKES NO PATIENTS
Editor
-
The Bells
Tennyson
-
God the Saviour from all Ills
SAMUEL GREENWOOD.
-
Common Sense
MARY E. HEYWORTH.
-
Self-Reliance
MRS. GERTRUDE MCCASLIN.
-
A Helpful Explanation
EBA MACNAIR.
-
Working out our Salvation
G. B. P.
-
The Wednesday Evening Testimonials
HARRY L. WORDEN.
-
Love all Excelling
K. B.
-
A Little Understanding
HATTIE E. RICHARDSON.
-
A Most Interesting Report
Fannie L. Pierce
-
There are many people who are only waiting for grand...
Joseph Parker
-
It is beyond words to tell what the understanding of...
Alice P. Hagar
-
Five years ago I came to Christian Science through the...
George Needham
-
Christian Science found me in the winter of 1900, a...
Seldon E. Richardson with contributions from F. D. S.
-
I would like to tell of the healing of a boy who was...
Rosetti Kneip
-
Announcements
with contributions from Stephen A. Chase
-
Religious Items
with contributions from Macduff, Cunningham Geikie, Theodore Parker, Stopford A. Brooke, Charles B. Upton