Eugene J. Harris, Committee on Publication for the State of Alabama,
Will the Advertiser, so fair on all questions, allow me a little space to give a view of Christian Science different from that contained in the report of a sermon by a well-known evangelist which recently appeared in its columns?
Excerpt from an article entitled "Problems of Life," Written by a clergyman,
Although some statements adverse to Christian Science were made in the article above mentioned, the following favorable excerpt is quoted, as of interest to Christian Scientists.
Pearl E. Reames, Committee on Publication for the State of Arkansas,
In this day of enlightenment and progress the allusion to Christian Science as "so-called" is somewhat anomolous, especially so since Christian Science has long ago been established as capable of scientific proof and demonstration.
W. Truman Green, Committee on Publication for the State of Florida,
Christian Scientists concede to physicians the right to control themselves and to minister to all those desiring their services, but physicians have neither an inherent nor a legislative right to compel any one to submit to their theories of medication, which are as unstable and changing as the color of a chameleon.
Brigman C. Odom, Committee on Publication for the State of Texas,
Evil, from the Christian Science point of view, is the negation of good; it denies that God is supreme; it has no relation whatsoever to the eternal Mind, infinite good, and does not exist in it; it is therefore not true, and hence not real.
William C. Brookes, Committee on Publication for the County of Midlothian,
A recent issue of your paper contained a report of an address by a clergyman, in which a number of incorrect statements are made regarding Christian Science and Christian Scientists.