Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Are we Inconsistent?
Among the many indictments named against Christian Science by its critics, one that we most frequently come upon is that of inconsistency in the practical application of its faith. The iconoclast, who has set for himself the task of breaking down the structure of Christian Science, seems to take especial delight in finding fault with its representatives because they eat, clothe themselves, build material edifices, and enjoy the beauties of art, music, and the best in literature. We are told that such practice is not what is to be expected, logically, from those who deny the very existence of matter and assert that Spirit is the only substance.
The casual observer of this religious movement may think that in the disparity between the statements of the Christian Science text-book, and the present experience of those who are its students, he has discovered grave inconsistencies. What he has really observed is the difference between the thing itself, and the individual apprehension of that thing; the difference between the whole and a part. It is the difference we find between mathematics, and the individual demonstration of mathematics. It is the same difference observable between philosophy in the abstract, and in practice. We find, too, the same difference between any theology and the disciple's effort to live that theology in his daily life. There is, in fact, no inconsistency. If the Christian, of whatever creed, were to be judged by the same unreasonable standard, he would be obliged to plead guilty to the charge. The Christian Scientist does not pretend to be able to prove now, in his experiences, the ultimate of Christian Science, because he is only a student and not a master, and he should not be judged as though he did make such a claim.
In this connection, we may mark well what our Leader says, in "Unity of Good." After referring to the demonstration over death, she says, page 55. "The achievement of this ultimatum of Science, complete triumph over death, requires time and immense spiritual growth.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
September 3, 1904 issue
View Issue-
Are we Inconsistent?
WILLARD S. MATTOX.
-
A Helpful Lesson
MABEL A. BIRDNO.
-
Would it be fair in assume that an orthodox church was...
Richard P. Verrall
-
In the fatherhood of God and the sonship of Christ, Christian Scientists...
William H. Jennings
-
The critic lays down the proposition that "the acceptance...
Ezra W. Palmer
-
The Lectures
with contributions from E. R. Fulton, E. V. Day, J. S. Bayne
-
MRS. EDDY TAKES NO PATIENTS
Editor
-
As to Diagnosis
M. with contributions from M.
-
Witnessing to Facts
Witnessing to Facts
-
Letters to our Leader
with contributions from F. S. Bellevue, Mary E. Hardy, Godfrey R. Pearse, Mabel S. Thomson, Burwell O. Griffin
-
For many years before coming West, I was actively...
For many years before coming West, I was actively...
-
I did not come to Christian Science for physical healing
Helen M. Palmer
-
In a moment of discouragement, I once expressed my...
Lucille Jocelyn
-
Ever since I became interested in Christian Science, it...
Ever since I became interested in Christian Science, it...
-
From our Exchanges
with contributions from Josiah Strong
-
Notices
with contributions from Stephen A. Chase