Because the methods employed by Christian Science in healing the sick do not happen to agree with the preconceived opinion of a judge in a police court about how the sick should be treated, is small reason for his accusing the Christian Science practitioner and the parents of a deceased boy of criminal neglect in the care and treatment of the boy, who is said to have died of influenza.
A clergyman in a recent issue of the Times is quoted as stating that Christian Scientists "believe that God is love," and takes issue with that teaching on the ground that it is "a denial of the fundamental principle of the Scriptures.
I am glad to answer the question of a critic, appearing in a recent issue, namely, Why is it that the adverse critics of Christian Science have always a false concept of it?
Christian Science is referred to in the report of a sermon in a recent issue, in a way that is misleading to those who are unfamiliar with its teachings.
