Edwin C. Buck, Committee on Publication for the State of New Hampshire,
The place accorded to "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" by Mary Baker Eddy, in the religion of Christian Science, is very different from that set forth in the statement "Science and Health is the Bible of the Christian Scientist," attributed in your columns to one of Manchester's leading clergymen in a recently reported sermon.
W. Stuart Booth, Committee on Publication for the State of Colorado,
As you request my opinion in connection with "America's Greatest Need," regarding the best way of reviving interest in church activity, I will briefly state the same.
Joseph Axtell, Committee on Publication for Somerset County, England,
In a recent issue of your paper a correspondent mentions that no reference was made to the surgeons' work at the recent Christian Science lecture in Bath.
Lester B. McCoun, Committee on Publication for the State of Nebraska,
I have noted the remarks of a correspondent in a recent issue of your paper in which he undertakes to classify Christian Science, which he admits he does not understand, with various forms of mental suggestion and faith cure.
In
Revelation we read of the tree of life, the leaves of which "were for the healing of the nations;" but until "Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures" by Mary Baker Eddy was given to the world, Bible readers, in general, were not able to glean from such Scriptural passages their depth of spiritual meaning; much less did they have the understanding to apply Bible truths to the healing of disease.