Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
Should Doctors be Named as Sole Guardians of the Public?
Boston Times
The proposition as to whether or not the sole guardianship of the public health should be placed in the hands of the M.D.'s is important, and involves a great many questions of detail. If medicine had proved itself an absolute cure for all the ills of the flesh, it might be looked upon as a necessity, and its disregard might be considered a neglect; but, as a matter of fact, thousands die daily under the care of reputable physicians, and no school of medicine has proved itself sufficiently successful to justify the condemnation of others. Christian Science, for example has healed hundreds who had formerly failed to recover under medical treatment, and it is safe to assume that there are millions who are in need of the same sort of rescue, and any law prohibiting the practice of Christian Science would, therefore, be a detriment to the public good and would result in the death of many thousands whom we may logically conclude could be saved through its ministry.
Again, Christian Science has not only been efficacious in healing those chronic cases which medicine has failed to reach, but it has proved itself to be a more efficacious method of curing acute troubles, not only in the treatment of adults but of children also, than any other known system.
It is needless to say that the prohibition of the acceptance of a fee is only another expression of the endeavor to prohibit the practice of Christian Science altogether. If the practice of Christian Science is wrong, withholding a fee would not make it right; on the other hand, if the practice is right, the acceptance of a monetary return does not make it wrong. The advisability of permitting the practice of Christian Science does not depend upon the question of accepting a fee therefor, and there could be no other possible motive for preventing the acceptance of a fee than the curtailment of the practice itself.
Enjoy 1 free Sentinel article or audio program each month, including content from 1898 to today.
October 21, 1905 issue
View Issue-
The Wrong Road and the Right
HON. CLARENCE A. BUSKIRK.
-
The Practicability of Christian Science
ALBERT E. MILLER.
-
"I will hear"
W. B. T.
-
An Appreciative Letter
T. A. Mead
-
Pleasant View in Autumn
GRACE WHITE.
-
Should Doctors be Named as Sole Guardians of the Public?
Alfred Farlow
-
If we believe in the teachings of the Bible, we cannot...
R. Stanhope Easterday
-
All that Christian Scientists want is fair play,—to be...
Arthur E. Jennings
-
If unreserved and lasting faith in Christ Jesus and full...
H. Cornell Wilson
-
The Lectures
with contributions from Milton Smith, Wm. C. Kaufman, James B. Peter, Charles D. Hayt
-
MRS. EDDY TAKES NO PATIENTS
Editor
-
Church By-law
Editor
-
A Progressive View
Archibald McLellan
-
Love's Sword
John B. Willis
-
What of the Night?
Annie M. Knott
-
Letters to our Leader
with contributions from M. Meehan, Editor, E. Y. Steele, George H. Kinter
-
After eighteen years of suffering, from what the doctors...
Frances A. Fox
-
When in Malta, at the beginning of last March, I first...
William H. Coomber
-
For six years I was a sufferer from nervous prostration
M. E. Jenkins
-
I was undressing my three-year-old boy for bed, when...
Rose B. Wheeler
-
For years I suffered physically and mentally, till this...
Candace Gamble
-
When I first heard of Christian Science I was in bondage...
Gena N. Dorsey
-
Last summer, when in the woods transplanting a fern,...
M. Louise Carroll
-
Before I came into Christian Science, my heart was...
Lizzie Gammie with contributions from O. W. Ingersoll
-
It is now almost four years since I became interested in...
Bernice F. Barker
-
Five years ago Christian Science healing was introduced...
Ned Watson with contributions from Edna W. Thielens
-
Notices
with contributions from Stephen A. Chase