Editorial May 2, 1901 Issue

Another Favorable Decision

Editor

One of the most important decisions respecting the legal status of Christian Science practice was handed down April 14 by Judge Eugene S. Elliott of the Circuit Court of Wisconsin. The case was that of the State v. Mrs. Crecenzia Arries and Miss Emma Nichols, who were brought before Police Justice Neelen of Milwaukee, charged with the violation of the law respecting the practice of medicine. Justice Neelen erroneously declared the defendants guilty, and fined them fifty dollars each. The defendants were represented by W. T. Turner. An appeal from the Police Court was taken, and the case thus brought before Judge Elliott, whose decision is final.

The judge maintains that prayer is not medical treatment, and that if it were so regarded in law, all clergymen would be subject to indictment for fulfilling their unquestioned duty and obligations. He emphasized the fact that Christian Scientists declare their opposition to the use of medicines, and that they are open and undeceiving as to their method of healing the sick.

The contention of the counsel for the state that the hypnotic suggestion often used by physicians is in its nature akin to Christian Science treatment, is entirely erroneous. The fact is they are diametrical opposites. This decision adds another to the long list of failures to estop Christian Science practice, and may be considered of great significance. We are glad to republish the judge's able argument and finding, in full, from the columns of The Evening Wisconsin.

Send a comment to the editors

We'd love to hear from you!

Easily submit your testimonies, articles, and poems online.

Submit

Another Favorable Decision

We'd love to hear from you!

Sign up for unlimited access