Are you sure?
This bookmark will be removed from all folders and any saved notes will be permanently removed.
'Once upon a time'
Some people may be familiar with the phrase “suspension of disbelief,” but I first encountered it in a screenwriting class many years ago. We learned that it means the writer must ensure that the early moments of a film, or any drama, lead the viewer to temporarily reject what he or she knows to be factual and true in order to accept the claims of the story.
To me this was simply an explanation of something we find ourselves doing all the time: putting aside truth for fiction, if only for a couple of hours. We enjoy it in the theater and we so often accept it as entertainment. In order to enjoy stories, the audience makes the semiconscious decision to put aside its disbelief and accept the presented premise as being real for the duration of the story. Hasn’t the opener “Once upon a time …” worked forever in this role?
One evening some time later, I saw a famous New York stage play that included many scenes of domestic conflict and colliding personal interests, all centered around an aging man losing his capabilities. As you can imagine, seeing the play was a depressing experience. The story was well directed, well acted, and very convincing, but there was so much anger, self-interest, and egotism in the story that I felt shaken. After the play, I remembered that screenwriting class and the role of “suspending disbelief.” I realized that I had accepted, to some degree, the shouted drama as indicating that conflict and decay are a natural part of life—but was I going to continue to accept as real that picture of conflict? Absolutely not!
It took me some time to let go of those depressing images, but after talking with a friend who had seen the play with me I remembered a favorite quote from Miscellaneous Writings 1883–1896 by Mary Baker Eddy: “The spiritualization of our sense of man opens the gates of paradise that the so-called material senses would close, and reveals man infinitely blessed, upright, pure, and free …” (p. 185 ). I began right then to watch how I was thinking about other people and other situations—on the stage, on the street, or in my own home—making sure that I wasn’t accepting as real any premise that involved discord, inharmony, or fear—and I found that the drama of the play lost its hold on me.
It is up to each of us to use good judgment in choosing what we take in. Life’s dramas, if they are based on the notion that we are vulnerable, sick, sinning mortals, are actually just as fictitious as a movie or TV show. God’s love for His creation is what is actually real. Mrs. Eddy wrote, “Christian experience teaches faith in the right and disbelief in the wrong” (Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, p. 29 ).
We should all continue to enjoy entertaining films, plays, and stories—but with prayer and practice, we can be more alert to suggestions of discord in everyday life and able to see them for what they are—fiction. As we hold strongly to honesty, perfection, integrity, and life—the spiritual facts we know to be true—we’ll see healing results.
–Fred Andresen, Laguna Hills, California