One
of the most common beliefs about Christian Science on the part of the uninformed, and the charge most frequently made against it by its critics, is that its work of healing from sin and disease is nothing but the action of one human mind upon another.
with contributions from Streeter, Hollis, Henry M. Baker, Archibald McLellan, Josiah E. Fernald, Fred C. Demond, Mary Baker G. Eddy, Frank S. Streeter, Fred N. Ladd, Arthur P. Morrill
Through the courtesy of The Concord Patriot we are able to print below a copy of the intervening petition filed by Streeter & Hollis in the Superior Court for Merrimack County, at Concord, N.
It is peculiar how readily a false impression is picked up and assimilated, and how hard a time truth has to find lodgment in the average mind, especially if it pertains to some new doctrine that is opposed to our early teachings and our opinionated prejudices.
There is pending in the lower house of the State Legislature, the Senate having already passed the measure, a bill designed ostensibly to regulate the practice of medicine and surgery, but in which there is a hidden purpose quietly waiting against the time when the bill shall become a law.
There are many present indications of a popular revulsion against the attacks made by sensational newspapers and magazines upon the Christian Science Church.
Some time ago we mentioned the interesting fact that Christian Science enabled a nervous woman to sit in the dentist's chair and smile in spite of pain.
