The writer of the serial story appearing in the News, in classifying Christian Science with human will and New Thought, made a mistake which is common to the uninformed.
The series of articles against Christian Science which began in the February number of The Diocesan Gazette are discreditable to the author, to the editor, and to whoever shares responsibility for them.
In
these times when human passions, unloosed, obscure to a great extent the motives which have hitherto served to guide human thought, Christian Scientists may well pause to weigh the value, not merely to themselves but to the world, of our Leader's last gift, The Christian Science Monitor.
Many
are asking to-day: What is the best means of helping our own country and the world at large to attain the victory of a lasting and democratic peace?
Men
and women everywhere are thrilled and inspired to higher and nobler endeavor by the deeds of bravery and self-sacrifice of others who have left and are leaving "footprints on the sands of time.
