Editorial October 3, 1977 Issue

Freedom of Expression

Nathan A. Talbot

People who live in democratic societies generally cherish their liberty to express themselves relatively free of restrictions. This right is exercised in diverse ways. One individual may convey ideas through the written or spoken word—another through artistic expression. But whatever avenue one chooses, the practice of this right without undue interference is generally considered fundamental to a free people.

This kind of basic human right can lend itself to abuse. In theory, a free people presume that their fellowman will exercise his freedom of expression in a way that will not harm. In practice, however, this trust is sometimes breached. People often do express themselves in ways that offend—ways that the majority may feel are detrimental to society. The temptation, then, is to restrict the freedom of expression.

Opinions will vary widely over how to achieve a proper balance between rights and responsibilities. Some will feel that freedom of expression should be absolute. They may argue that even though it makes for a rocky road, it's the only way to preserve freedom and provide the kind of climate where fresh and useful ideas can emerge. Some of the bad, it is said, is the price we pay for giving human thought the opportunity to sprout potentially useful ideas.

Send a comment to the editors

We'd love to hear from you!

Easily submit your testimonies, articles, and poems online.

Submit

Freedom of Expression

We'd love to hear from you!

Sign up for unlimited access