In two recent sermons by an evangelist reference was made to Christian Science in a manner which showed a misapprehension of its true teachings on the part of the speaker, and a consequent wrong impression was conveyed in what was said.
Christian Science is referred to in a reprint from a medical journal in a way that shows a woeful lack of intelligence on the subject on the part of the author.
A writer's comments in your columns on the teachings of Christian Science remind me of the following definition in the Encyclopædia Britannica: "Materialism in its modern sense is the view that all we know is body, of which mind is an attribute or function.
At
the present time a great deal is heard about knitting, and it seems to engross the feminine portion of each community, from the children whose hands are so tiny they can scarcely manage the needles to the grandmothers and great-grandmothers.
Until
the outbreak of the world war I had been a reader of The Christian Science Monitor for over four years and had derived great pleasure, enlightenment, and other benefits from its pages.
"Oh
, how I love God!" Such was the involuntary outcry of a woman who had just passed unscathed through one of the greatest calamities of modern times.
For
many years prior to coming to Canada I was a local preacher connected with the Methodist church in Ireland, and as such was recommended to the Methodist church in America.
The
distinction between spirituality and materiality is being clearly discerned by a larger number of people than ever before in the world's history, and this great boon to humanity has become practicable through the discovery of Christian Science.
