Commenting upon the editorial, "A Mad World," from The Christian Science Monitor, which has been widely reprinted, a very interesting editorial in the Garfield Enterprise of November 8 says: "But we protest against the conclusion of this article.
A second letter of opposition to Christian Science recently published in your paper, presented two points which furnish occasion for helpful explanations.
Under
the seeming necessity for conserving our food supply to the utmost, because of the great need of those in other lands, who have suffered most from the war, how important it is that Christian Scientists fulfill their sacred mission by remembering that, as Mrs.
Christian Science
is the Holy Ghost, or understanding of God, the application of which to the human need practically demonstrates that man is the Son of God, perfect and eternal.
Since a representative of another faith attacked Christian Science in your columns, because of what it teaches on fear as related to an epidemic of disease, your readers are likely to be interested in what other persons, at least equally well informed, have said on the same subject.
"May I not tender the expression of my sincere thanks for the kind interest your committee has taken in us prisoners in giving us the opportunity to hear a Christian Science lecture?
The letter in your columns, from a local preacher who protested against the enforced closing of churches, is well written and highly commendable, with one exception.
